Search Results: one campaign

A follow question to my first one.

These are some common stigmas that are projected on this group that are likely the result of propaganda campaigns.

Choose the one you believe to be true and support your choice in the comments.

Our government operates under the premise of a 'democratic republic'. Early American thinkers such as Jefferson advocated this style of rulership because the sovereign power was 'in the people', policy that is generated is supposed to reflect 'the general will' of the population. A strong (difficult to alter) constitution was intended to make sure elected officials upheld the ethical standards and served to mitigate any incentive of corruption. In effect no 'social class' is above the law.

However it is blatantly obvious that this political model is failing horribly. The driving force of all policy has do with only one thing - currency. Political agenda is influenced solely by the amount of income donated to the representative during campaign periods. Modern parties go as far as to DENY science in the formulation of policy.

Furthermore people are afraid of authorities. The so called 'war on drugs' serves only to generate revenue for the PRIVATELY OWNED prison cooperation who strike deals with state legislators requiring a 'minimum' occupancy number that skyrockets every year.

It is clearly time for a change.

Something happened in the past couple of days that was completely glossed over and ignored by the liberal press (which makes up 90+% of all the press).

The FBI sought and won a search warrant to search the 650,000 newly discovered emails it found on a computer belonging to Clinton's top aide Huma Abedin and her husband Anthony Weiner which includes thousands of emails that are related to the FBI's Hillary Clinton espionage and public corruption criminal investigation. They presented their case for getting a separate warrant specifically for the Hillary Clinton criminal investigation in order to inspect those emails. And they got it.

The significance of this is immense. This marks the first time in the investigation that a JUDGE has issued any kind of ruling on the matter. In order for the warrant to be approved the federal judge ruled that there was PROBABLE CAUSE THAT A CRIME WAS COMMITTED related to the Hillary Clinton case and therefore the search is permitted under the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution. That means, for the first time, a judge has agreed that there is at least probable cause a crime was committed with respect to the Hillary Clinton case, and for the first time the matter has been introduced to the judiciary branch of government and the courts and for the first time it means there now can be a grand jury convened to consider the evidence of crimes and for the first time, the case is just one step away from a criminal indictment.

Hillary Clinton is now the first presidential candidate in history eligible to have her potential criminal conduct investigated by a grand jury.

Contrary to Clinton campaign disinformation and propaganda and the liberal regurgitation of that propaganda in the press, this is not only a reopening of the criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton, it is a massive expansion of that investigation that has surged ahead to only a step away from a potential criminal indictment.

Why would ANYONE vote for Hillary Clinton?