Search Results: women executives

California became the first state to require its publicly held corporations to include women on their boards after Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill into law on Sunday.

The bill, which applies to companies “whose principal executive offices” are in California, requires them to have at least one woman on their boards by the end of 2019.

In 2021, the companies must have a minimum of two or three women, depending on the size of their boards.
Hundreds of companies will be affected by the law, according to The Los Angeles Times, and those that fail to comply can be fined $100,000 for a first violation and $300,000 for a second violation.

Excerpt: www.nytimes.com/.../...-boards-california.amp.html

What are your thoughts? Is legally mandated diversity the right thing to do? Is it a violation of corporation's or employer's rights?

-Early last year female executive promotions were down
-Tech companies and agencies are now instituting standardizes tests for all candidates (i've seen this happen at my job) leading to more men scoring higher and getting positions
-More women complaining that being young and attractive is causing them to be avoided by men in powerful positions
-Companies tell male managers NOT to have 1-on-1 closed door meetings with female employees
-Groups of higher-ranking males will go out drinking with lower-ranking males to network and socialize but won't invite women out of fear of accusations (also saw this happen and I've seen it lead to these informal drinking sessions lead to male employees being given better projects)
-The wage gap is actually WIDENING as compared to 2016...

#metoo and "all men are rapists" has actually made many men run and hide in holes but these holes are turning out to be lucrative... Ladies what's the solution?

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/23/upshot/why-the-number-of-female-chief-executives-is-falling.html


"But in some companies, it (#metoo) has also had the opposite effect, by discouraging men from mentoring junior women out of fear that it might be interpreted the wrong way."

Feminism's massive influence on society has taken us from traditional morals and gender roles to an age of female entitlement. But in the last several years, men's groups like MGTOW have risen from the ash heap of male privilege to challenge it. Then last year feminism suffered its biggest setback yet when Hillary lost the election to a chauvinistic serial groper. Feminists wept and MGTOW cheered as Trump rolled back Title IX protections for women.

However, the tides may have turned again now that male executives, producers and journalists everywhere are getting fired over sexual assault claims. These incidents confirm the very things feminism has always preached -- that men are predators and women are victims. The president who embodied male entitlement is now under investigation and many of his toxic male cohorts in the White House are gone.

Yet the more success and power that women achieve at men's expense, the more it calls into question their status as victims deserving special treatment. How can it be claimed that women's voices are ignored and disbelieved when they are bringing down powerful CEOs and media moguls on an almost daily basis? These doubts chip away at the foundations of feminism and provide an opening for a MGTOW comeback.

So which of these rabid groups is currently winning the war: MGTOW or the FEMINISTS?