Search Results: poll results

The question is:

If feminism and the results of it had never existed, would MGTOW exist?

The poll is a simple yes or no.

I'm helping a friend out and I'm updating the polls on here and show him the results.

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/republicans-donald-trump-third-party-poll-122250833.html A Shocking Number Of Republicans Would Join Donald Trump In Third Party: Poll

A new poll revealed that Republican voters’ loyalty to former President Donald Trump remains high, as does their ignorance about the Capitol riot.

If Trump were to form his own political party, as he has reportedly considered, a plurality of his GOP backers would follow him there, by a margin of 46% to 27%, with the rest undecided, according to the Suffolk University/USA Today poll released Sunday.

The results, from 1,000 Republicans who voted for Trump in his losing bid to win a second term, also indicated no letup in his followers’ baseless denial of who was involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol siege.

Fifty-eight percent of Trump voters called the insurrection “mostly an antifa-inspired attack that only involved a few Trump supporters,” while 28% deemed it a “rally of Trump supporters, some of whom attacked the Capitol.”

“It looked horrendous, but how are we to know who was actually taking part?” Christina Rodriguez, 79, from Texas, told USA Today

Adolf Hitler -- Socialist Dictator responsible for the deaths of 5.5 million jews and 30 million soldiers and civilians. War criminal.


Mao Ze Dong -- Communist dictator responsible for deaths of 40 to 70 million deaths through prison labor, starvation, and execution.

Donald John Trump -- Republican leader and economic expert responsible for lowest unemployment in history, ending countries at war funded by previous presidential administrations, blocking tyrannical socialist forces such as the democratic party and biased news media outlets. impeached and acquitted twice by corrupt governmental forces. fought for a fair and free election process and and the right of free speech.

Jozef Stalin -- Socialist Dictator of the Soviet Union organized and led a massive campaign of repression of the government, party, intelligentsia, and armed forces, in which millions of “enemies of the working class’ were imprisoned, executed, or exiled, without due process.

Joseph Biden -- responsible for withdrawing troops from Iraq in 2011, it led to the immediate rise of ISIS and the murder of tens of thousands of Christians. Embraced segregation in 1975, claiming it was a matter of 'black pride'. Signed a crime bill that specifically targeted blacks and Hispanics giving them longer prison terms for minor crimes. calling black people "super predators, beyond the pale and need to be taken off our streets!". He publicly revealed the identity of the special-operations unit responsible for bin Laden’s killing putting their lives in jeopardy and getting the entire squad killed. known to be very touchy feely with women and young prepubescent children. paying off poll fraudsters in the 2020 presidential election and using dominion to alter results using foreign interference.

Yakubu Gowon -- nigerian head of state responsible for 100,000 military casualties. Moreover, between 500,000 and 2 million Biafran people died from starvation.

limited in space.
who do you think is worse?

I definitely feel like I do and I get the impression that others do too, but I guess we'll see with the poll results.

An example to help you understand what I mean:

Let's say you're teaching two people something they're totally new to, separately and neither of them understand it well and ask questions, regarding whatever you're teaching them. You like the first person, but not the second one, who are you more likely to get annoyed at? I feel like it's the second one, simply because you don't like them anyway. Sometimes, the sheer presence of someone you don't like, can ruin your mood.

A 20 yr-old vote counter had his life threatened - by right wing nutjobs
A Georgia state cyber security worker was told he’d be drawn and quartered- by right wingers
Our president called the GA Sec of State and asked him overturn the election results.
Feels like Jim Crow days and poll taxes.
The voter fraud is voter suppression.

In some poll questions, some users post a poll option that says something like 'see results'.

This can be great for users looking to add points to vote, if they don't care about the question, as you do get 1 point for voting on a poll, I think, so this would take away this advantage for them, I guess.

Do you think there should be a way to see the results of a poll, without actually having to vote on one, so you'd basically have a 'see results' option by default?

Yes, I get that you can see how much percent of people voted for option 'a', 'b' or whatever, but that's only when you've already opened it by voting or if it's your own poll.

Personally, I think it'd be a good feature to add, though I'm not too bothered if they don't, but it would be better for the poll result accuracy overall, instead of having 275 people voting 'see results', as well as those who may vote for any option, just to open the poll, especially if one get's a lot of votes - some people could still mess with votes, yes, but some people can be idiots on the internet, that doesn't mean it should be banned altogether.

Should this also apply for polls that only girls or only guys can vote on, because people who can't answer may still want to see the results?

It's only a improvement suggestion, before anyone get's upset for whatever reason and I'm just curious to see what people vote, as well as any potential reasons why people agree or disagree with it.

This question is ONLY for those who are into politics, so if you aren't, then don't answer.

It may sound like the other question I posted, but it's different, though it'll probably appeal to some of the same audience, it's just a bit of a different perspective.

Once again, the person fits your other standards and is amazing in every other way.

Let's just say, the person never has voted, nor will they ever, simply because they have no interest and you cannot convince them otherwise.

Again, no arguing politics, it's just about your personal dating standard.

Like with my other question, I'm more interested in the poll results, but you can answer and state why, if you wish.

Let's say you meet a partner who's basically perfect for you in every other way and their behaviour is that of a normal person, so none of these stereotypes about people from certain sides behaving in a certain way.

You'll never have a way of finding out their political views, simply because they don't share it with anyone, so they may or may not share your views, you'll just never know, nor would they drop any hints, but you know that they definitely have views, an interest in the topic and will always vote.

Some consider opposing political views to be a deal breaker and that's fine, have whatever deal breakers and standards you want.

This is not for you to start arguing over politics or bash any sides, save it for your own questions or you'll probably getting blocked.

If you wish to state whatever party you support or what side you're on, then feel free, but it's not mandatory.

Simply state whether or not the mystery of never knowing your partner's political views would be a deal breaker for you and if you can, also say why.

I'm mostly interested in the poll results to see what people vote, because I feel like this is a bit of an uncommon question regarding how political views influence people's relationship standards and deal breakers.