Polls: Society & Politics

Here's CT law... yep, you can.

Ya think that person has registration, enough insurance and training?

Ya think that person gonna hang around if they were at fault causing an accident?

Ya think if they were injured they are going to pay or you are?

Check if your state permits this... what's strange is that the states that support it have the best public transport. go figure.

https://www.ncsl.org/immigration/states-offering-drivers-licenses-to-immigrants

Granted... they could drive illegally.. without a drivers license.

Currently it’s structured two-party…not saying third parties are prohibited. But elections, and frankly us voters, like to follow party lines of red and blue. And third parties have more hoops.

Look at all the parties in France. They’re leaders are elected with 30% of the vote at best.

It is funny that when we assist other countries with constitutions and governments our State officials usually recommend a Parliament like above. Not a two-state republic. I guess cuz baby countries have so many interests who aren’t aligned yet.

and what color of chocolate?

Mayor Adams (of NYC) talks about how chocolate is his government. I like M. Adams, somewhat... but cmon...

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6346365706112?dicbo=v2-YBTYUW2

He's alluding to that people are angry at him because of the "chocolateness" in the government. Say what? That is not the issue...

The issue is:

* Giving so much in resources to illegal immigrants, being an asylm place that cannot handle all these people. Denying Texas the ability to protect themselves while supporting the Fed which is allowing it. Denying the immigrants people jobs so they cannot pay their way (fed issue). Taking resources away from tax payers and giving to others... and high quality resources at that. Wasting resources (expensive food and food they won't eat thrown away).

The issue is your thinking and decisions... if that's chocolate, then so be it.

There are other people with better ideas... and blaming color here... don't go there, not the issue.

Solution: Drink more coffee and wake up...

Or government's... Came from a Lab? Came from a wet market? Vaccines... Just broad... Did they lie?

• https://biopolitics.substack.com/p/the-leftist-personality-left-wing

Musk: "This explains why there are so few deportations, as every deportation is a lost vote."

• https://www.foxnews.com/us/musk-biden-opened-border-floodgates-democrats-can-stay-power

Prosecutors say Jennifer Crumbley had a duty under Michigan law to prevent her son, who was 15 at the time, from harming others. She's accused of failing to secure a gun and ammunition at home and failing to get help for her son's mental health.

Both are famous for making many verbal gaffes in the past year.

It's a fukking nightmare. But you decide.

What I mean by that is just because men like Andrew Tate or Jeremy Meeks get swarmed by lots of women and thus marks them as the top 10% of men (or the top tier men) doesn't actually mean, that the conventional, every-day girl wants to go after them too and that it is the same as saying Belle Delphine and SSSniperwolf are getting lots of men and thus marks them as the top 10% of women (or the top tier women) and it doesn't mean, that the conventional, every-day boy wants to go after them too.

I never spent any money on only fans nor did I ever order their bath water and after seeing just 2 minutes of SSSniperwolf I clicked away because she's way too annoying.

In essence it can be said, that women, who collectively go after the top tier men like Andrew Tate or Jeremy Meeks are basically female sycophants in the same way as men, who collectively throw their money at the top tier women like Belle Delphine or SSSniperwolf are sycophants.

Losers

What do you think?

• Women may or may not have their Own Biases
• They may or may not allow you to Participate in child rearing.
• They may or at not Downplay your Role in the child's upbringing.
• They may or may not undermine your authority as the Father.