Polls: Entertainment & Arts

Apparently the next James Bond will be chosen before the end of 2026.

James Bond will probably be chosen from my list below, who do you think will make the best James Bond, and why do you think he'll make a good James Bond?

I will ask the same question again when the next James Bond is chosen, and I'll give a MHO to the person's with the correct opinion, or if there is a few people with the correct answer, I'll have a prize draw to choose the winners.

Europe's history is pretty dynamic, unlike many other societies with abrupt change because of industrial revolution and European colonization. Europe went through so many phases with aesthetics that continue to get cooler until the Georgan era. That is when they started to get "lame" in my opinion. But i still have to say steampunk is pretty cool too, commonly based on Victorian era. And then the Edwardian just feel "boomer" to me lol.

I think Medieval and Renaissance are like a tie to me. Medieval got that crusade, dragon and castles focus but renaissance is like the awkward stage of being composed, "formal", long suits and ornate patterns especially from western Europe, but it still has that medieval coolness, unevenly mixed with castles, folklores, tunics and crusade mindset that contrasts, notably coming from the Holy Romans.

Overall i might go with medieval, but i would choose renaissance if specifically with renaissance Spain which uniquely fuses medieval, renaissance and pirates vibes. Portugal to some extent mixed them nicely too.

Tina Fey and Amy Poehler are former Saturday Night Live comedians who have done well in the entertainment industry. They have often worked together, hosting award shows and other events. Each has also directed and acted in TV shows and films.

In short, they are attractive intelligent and funny women.

If you had the opportunity to have dinner with one of them, which would you prefer?

Please vote in the poll and tell us why that's your choice.

Spoilers - you wonder if the Cullens are the best fictional couple ever, besides Rose and Jack (Titanic) lol. www.nbcnews.com/.../renesmee-revealed-fans-get-first-look-bella-edwards-daughter-flna827925

I for one think they make the happiest fictional couple and look at their daughter, it's as if they're a real family unit. Maybe I should finally watch the goddamn films. All of them.

Spooky movie.

And I just ordered the Blu-ray DVD online via Courier.

I was really impressed as the DVD and the film poster the last few months kept jumping out at me. And then 🤳🏻📱 YouTube suggested I watch the magic trick clip with Katie 🍫

Spooky man. Spooky. On level with 2023s The Boogeyman which I saw in cinemas. Damn 👀

Even right down to the poster, even right down to the copilot having a freakout lol "oh God, Jesus I see nothing but houses" lol 😆🙀

I recently bought the Blu Ray DVD. Praise Jesus lol y'all praise Jesus ✝️😅🙏🏻🤲🏻

A relationship of mutual convenience? Lol The Simpsons classic episode

Sometimes compared to a transactional relationship / trade off relationship. Fame and publicity. Rather than genuine 💕😘

Most rankings I've seen put Iowa and Hood neck and neck for first place. More people tend to say Hood was more beautiful but Iowa takes the cake in my opinion. BUT one hill that I'll die on is that the IJN Mikasa is the most beautiful of the pre-dreadnoughts battleships.

If Michael Jackson was still with us today in 2026, do you think he would have retired and walked away from it all, or would he still be ruling the stage and giving us 100%? Imagine it for a second.

It’s 2026, and Michael would be 68 years old. The fedora is still tilted just right, and the iconic white glove is still on—but the world around us is completely different. Would the man who gave us Thriller, Bad, and Dangerous look at modern TikTok dances, AI music, and stadium tours selling out in three seconds, and simply decide, "You know what? I’ve done enough"?

Or would he do the exact opposite?

Would he walk into a studio tomorrow and drop an album that makes Thriller look like a demo? Would he announce “The Final Moonwalk Tour” and instantly crash every ticket website on Earth? Would he still be out there on stage at 68, hitting that signature toe-stand in Smooth Criminal while the rest of us are just trying to catch our breath?

Because that’s the thing about Michael—he never did things halfway. He didn’t come to play it safe; he came to change music forever. Legends like him don’t really retire. They just wait for the right moment to completely redefine the game.

What do y'all think? Would MJ have gracefully stepped into a quiet retirement by now, or would he still be the undisputed King of Pop outperforming everyone else in the industry today?

Hey everyone, I was watching a podcast interview with an independent artist talking about ownership, and it completely blew my mind. They were talking about how streaming platforms like Spotify and Apple Music have completely ruined how we appreciate music because we don't actually own anything anymore—we’re just paying monthly "rent" to listen to our favorite tracks. On top of that, Spotify and Apple Music barely pay the artist anything, with streaming payouts drying up so badly that creators can barely survive off digital plays alone while corporate tech giants divide up all the profits.

They even pointed out how digital files can literally be swapped out or changed overnight without our permission (like I heard what happened of a viral TikTok EDM song cloned an AI voice and the platforms completely changed the track on people's downloaded playlists). If your phone dies, your password gets lost, or a platform deletes an album, your entire music history is just gone.

It made me remember how different it felt saving up to buy a physical CD or vinyl record growing up. You stood on line, looked at the lyric booklet, and listened to it front-to-back until it skipped because it was yours. Now, because of streaming convenience, people just listen to an album for a weekend and immediately move on to the next trend.

Do you guys think physical media needs to make a massive comeback so we can actually own our music, support artists directly, and appreciate the art form again? Or are we too dependent on the convenience of streaming to ever care about physical copies?

Let me know your thoughts on digital ownership versus physical media!

Hey everyone, I’ve been thinking a lot about the current music landscape lately, and honestly, it feels like we’re stuck in a massive cycle of fast-food songs. Everywhere I turn on TikTok or the radio, it’s just mediocre artists throwing together a quick 15-second viral loop, blowing up for a month, and then completely burning out to make room for the next copycat. It feels like our generation doesn’t have its own definitive music or timeless household stars anymore.

I was reading up on how old-school labels used to break legendary artists, and it made me curious about an idea. What if someone put together a high-concept compilation album that functioned entirely as a musical talent incubator?

Like, instead of chasing established mainstream charts, a producer goes out and finds completely undiscovered, raw independent artists with massive star quality and true penmanship, and brings them together on one massive project to launch them into stardom. No heavy, robotic Auto-Tune, no lazy songwriting committees—just raw, clear vocal authority and authentic storytelling over heavy, timeless rhythms.

Do you guys think a project like that could actually shake things up and redirect the future of music back to something real and substance-driven? Or is the current industry too broken by algorithms for genuine homegrown talent to become true stars again?

Would love to hear your thoughts and opinions on the state of music right now! 💿

Take your time. It's an important decision.