Search Results: attractive features

A question on here got me thinking about this. Which set of children would you rather have by the age of 50?

Option A: You have a son and a daughter who's one year younger. Son just turned 18 and daughter is 17. They seemed to have gotten all the worse genetics from either of their parents. The son is about 176 cm (5'10") and the daughter is about 164 cm (5'5"). They are both underweight. They are not attractive looking in the face; maybe a 5 or 6 out of 10 in looks. They are not considered cool or popular in school. They are shy, quiet, or otherwise unappealing in school. However, they love you unconditionally and have never been bad or troublesome. They were very easy to raise, even if they didn't turn out how you'd like.

Option B: You have a daughter and a son who's genetics possibly defied yours. The daughter just turned 18 and the son is 17. The daughter is 183 cm (6'0") tall and the son is 195 cm (6'5"). Both of them look like 9s in appearance, but still have features from you and the other parents (so you won't think your spouse cheated on you or something); just the best possible features from each of you. They are both in perfect fit shape and could be models or athletes. They are considered popular in school and can likely get into any college they want. They'll likely be rich and successful. However, they never listened to you or liked you growing up. They were always mean and seemed to have sociopathic tendencies. They are also bullies and generally mean people in reality around their peers, as well.