Search Results: reality shows

Read below for information on SCP 3812:

To understand SCP-3812, you need to understand the “Recursive Stack” reality model proposed by Dr. Scranton in the article itself. The model says that there are different layers to reality, each a multiverse to itself, and there exists infinite of them.

It says that every fictional narrative is completely real, and that that narrative exists “below” the parent narrative. It’s more of a pyramid than a stack, really.

Let’s take the TV show “Friends” as an example. Between us and “Friends”, there are three observable stacked universes. First, there’s the baseline, our universe, then there’s the Stack below us which is the universe of “Friends,” and (if you’ve forgotten) in “Friends” the character Joey is an actor in a fictional TV show called “Days of our Lives.” This show, is also a Stack, and is placed underneath the universe of “Friends.”

So, SCP-3812 is a realitybender created by djKaktus to be a reality bender that can go “up” these stacks, to transcend fictional narratives. This is what the actual SCP is. The SCP is created by Kaktus with the goal of being an omnipotent reality bender that can go up these stacks. This kind of knowledge drives 3812 insane and makes him unable to differentiate between reality and fiction because, to him, they are one and the same. Literally.

SCP 3812 is infinitely transcending fictional narratives.

In recent weeks, with the looming possibility (now reality) of Roe v. Wade being overturned, I have read countless comments from women saying that men should do more to support women in their fight for reproductive choice. But I've not seen any of them supporting men's right to reproductive choice. Not one.

The argument women use is one of "bodily autonomy", but studies show the vast majority (96%) of abortions are for reasons like not being emotionally ready to become a parent, not wanting a child to interfere with education or career plans, not being in a stable relationship or not having the financial means to support a child. In other words, all the same reasons men might not be ready to become a parent.

https://www.umassmed.edu/news/news-archives/2019/05/who-are-the-1-in-4-american-women-who-choose-abortion/

So the bodily autonomy argument is disingenuous at best, but they have to use it because the true reasons women choose abortion are the same ones men have to not want to become a parent, but don't have the right to exercise like women had before Roe v. Wade was overturned. It's about personal autonomy, not bodily autonomy, and both women and men should have equal rights to personal autonomy.

I'm talking about men having the right to a "paper abortion", which means signing away all their parental rights and responsibilities early enough in the pregnancy that the mother could still choose to have an abortion. That would require that women must notify the father she is pregnant, but today men don't have the right to know they have a child, born or unborn. A woman can have a man's child and never tell him, or she can choose to tell him years later and demand child support having already robbed the father of many years with his son or daughter.

So guys... if women were more supportive of YOUR right to "personal autonomy" and to know you have a child in the world, would you be more likely to advocate for women's right to personal autonomy (i. e., abortion)?