Search Results: less interested in family

You've been elevated to the highest level of society... the bilderburgs, Trilateral Commission.. even higher than that! Your goal is to address human over population!

You are above nations and governments. You've read the UN Commission report Agenda 21 to depopulate the planet, but action needs to be taken to curb growth now! The sub committee to contain human population growth has returned their findings.

It's known humans want to produce 4-6 children each, as they do in Africa. However, the planet cannot support more growth, or would be better with decline... less there be a resource collapse and ensuing social disarray and wars!

Which way would you vote, given the options?

Disrupt the hormonal environment - We know mating is driven by hormones. By disrupting the hormonal environment, such as dropping testosterone in men... reduces drive. Social chaos ensues, but there is less interest in building and maintaing family units.

Social disruption - alter the relationship between male and female roles and chaos, divorces, social disruption ensues. Has the positive effect of increasing family division... which increases enconomy, although creates poorer family units, putting strain on government resources.

Wars: creation of continual proxy wars between major nations, thinning population. Has risk of greater conflict and strain on govt resources.

Drugs: Use of drugs to increase deaths, family decay, homicides, suicides. Includes usage of pharma/medical systems and legal drug systes (alcohol) the addict and control populations.

Sub conscious programming: Subliminal messages in media communications to dissuade people from building families. Includes media control with reports of tragedies.

Limit training and knowledge of social values, relational skills, encourage social decay by dissuading religious values.

I made this all up, there is no fact here, but one has to wonder. Societies are so messed up it starts to look... intentional.