Search Results: present your case

So... you remember a couple weeks ago when the FBI announced they were reopening the case on Clinton? Well, turns out some of those documents they were investigating may have been faked by the Russian government according to the FBI themselves and U. S. Intelligence Agency.

Here's a portion of what it says, forged under U. S. Senator Tom Carper:

"Carper is quoted as saying the Department of Homeland Security had advised him of a risk that a "massive" cyber attack "could change the election results in favor of a specific candidate." The document dated October 3 was reviewed by Reuters.

It concludes, "Any suspicious incident will be immediately reported to your assistants so that a recount of votes could be timely organized. You will not lose the election because of some compromised electronic voting systems." The fake Carper letter is one of several documents presented to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U. S. Department of Justice for review in recent weeks."

Here's the full copy of this letter



Because of the suspicion, the FBI has asked all Democratic Officials to provide copies of the documents in question so they can be further examined. These documents were in EMAILS, and it is believed the Democratic Party's email was hacked.

Russia denies doing this. There was also another seven page email document circulating claiming the poll numbers for Clinton have plummeted and called for “severe strategy changes for November” that could include “staged civil unrest” and “radiological attack” with dirty bombs to disrupt the vote.


Here's the issue now. Not too many people believe it was Russia, but rather our own government's attempt to do more damage to Clinton's campaign when it looked like she was going to win key swing states, even though the reopening hasn't had a huge impact on the polls. Others say it's just part of the liberal agenda (whatever that means).

What do you think?


Source: Click here.

He says if he was Ubering and a passenger didn't want to leave the car. Just kept refusing to leave the car he would shoot the passenger if he had a gun in his car.

I argued that you shouldn't shoot a person even if he was on/in your property unless its self-defense or you feel your life is threatened in some way. In the case he presented I would not shoot. I may threaten but not shoot

Do you agree with Me or My friend?