Search Results: signals

Warning, this is going to be a wall of text but I'll keep it as lean as possible.

What do you think, will a relationship work if the man is the technical one, uses Arch Linux OS on his device, a custom ROM on his mobile device instead of Android (that is if it's not a flip phone), encrypted his devices and data and uses strong passwords, decentralizes everything, that he uses, that he can decentralize (avoids the know your customer central exchanges such as Binance and uses something like Electrum instead), avoids using those tech giants services (especially Google and Microsoft and their email services and instead either uses something like Proton, Tuta or self-hosts his own and private Email provider) and staying off from social media (meaning he has no account on there to begin with) and resists mass surveillance and privacy violating things and trying as much to stay under the radar whenever possible and avoids using Whatsapp and instead uses Signal, the messaging app, that Edward Snowden has endorsed while his girlfriend/wife/woman is a stark contrast to it: She is avid on social media, posting regularly about many things including her private life and activities and very openly stating her personal opinions in such public places, consuming content on Tik Tok and Instagram and the likes, uses either Windows 10 or 11 or MacOS with Apple devices, has an iPhone, uses Apple products and services, maybe uses a Google account with google services like Gmail, hides nothing, has a weak if any password, uses privacy violating mainstream apps like Whatsapp and doesn't really mind the cuckware, that came preinstalled with her devices.

(This has got to be the longest sentence I have written)

Can such a relationship work or even prosper?

In my experience even just not being on social media has yielded me reactions from people, that can be described as me wearing an aluminum hat. Or those weird questions like "Who/what/why are you hiding?" like i'd tell ya, you fkn idiot

Aside from showing the desperation of Putin by recruiting North Korean troops, if they deploy to Ukraine that is a VERY DANGEROUS escalation as DefSec has said they are "fair game" for Ukrainian troops using USA provided weapons.

Given this "Murphy's Law" scenario, should the US stop arming Ukraine?

Trump has been having private conversations with Putin; do you think he got advance notice on this issue?

DoD leaks say USA fears that China will invade Taiwan while everyone is busy in Ukraine. Do you see that as a real possibility?

DoD leaks also fear that Israel will exploit the situation to annex the occupied territories and/or use the distraction to REALLY fuck up Iran. Do you see that as a real possibility?

Trump has been having private conversations with Putin. Is it possible that Trump & Putin will make this the "October surprise"?

If Putin needs NK troops does that signal a fatal weakness & Russia will likely walk away shamed & decimated with nothing to show but failure & Ukraine quickly joins NATO or the EU or both?

If North Korean troops deploy to Ukraine, is it time for Zelensky to make peace with Russia given NKs manpower & weaponry?

www.foxnews.com/world/north-korea-has-sent-troops-russia-pentagon-confirms.amp

What does he need to have or do to be attractive enough for her? How much of a disadvantage does he have to overcome? Tell me your ideal 5'6'' man who would win your heart.

Women are often accused of virtue signaling in these cases, but please give the harsh and honest truth. If you are a girl who is thin yourself, then your opinion is especially appreciated!

It is forecast that the $1.3 trillion estimated cost of annual foregone revenue from Trump's tax reduction plans (out of a total revenue intake of $6.3 trillion annually) is a shortfall of 20.1% which would be offset by $5.9% increase in revenue from Trump's tariff plan.
In sum, a total loss of $14.2% of federal revenue with no plans for how to make up the shortfall. He has suggested giving the President control over the Fed to set interest rates as well as control of the money supply (printing money). He has also suggested to eliminate the debt ceiling. Economists & the Congressional Budget Office have derided both of these ideas as leading to precipitous rises and consumer prices and dangerously inflationary.

More detailed breakdown:
Donald Trump's proposed tariffs to make up this revenue loss from his tax cuts (which include a 10% worldwide tariff and a 60% tariff on Chinese goods paid for by the American consumer - so in effect a hidden tax), are estimated to generate approximately $280 billion annually.
If the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Trump legislations provisions are made permanent, it is estimated that the federal government would experience a reduction in revenues of approximately $400 billion annually.
Additionally, the long-term fiscal impact would increase the national debt by $16.5 trillion over the next 75 years. This revenue loss primarily arises from the continuation of foregone income tax introduced by the TCJA.
Regarding the image above, Trump has NO ability to influence insurance rates as they are set at the state level, Congress has signaled that they have no plans to restore the state and local tax deduction (SALT), the president has no ability to mandate coverage of IVF treatment and the president has no ability to set credit card interest rates.