Search Results: why would you ignore her

There is an apparent gender conflict going on that has polarised men and women with non binary usually tending toward the women's end that has created a lot of toxicity and relationship challenges that has seen a rise of things MGTOW and 4B away from interaction between the members of a social species because of political leanings about how society has treated and perceived injustices between each side that seem to ignore the others points of view.

Given that women tend to be the victims of sex based crime but men are of crime in general (while also ignoring reasons why it's also men who end up in a life of crime as well as making up most of the low status positions and as victims of societies lack of provisions for those in need such as homelessness, poverty, destitution, domestic violence, etc.) the current narrative is that women negatively prejudice against men they don't know as threatening or risky until a man proves himself to not be so while women are not regarded similarly.

So should employment be restricted in a similar way that women can request a female doctor for consultation, that men should therefore be appraised on their suitability for jobs by other men instead of having mixed or women only employment panels. (One could use the same notion that women getting jobs over men because they're more appealing to the eye and thus able to use that attraction for a business as being a valid reason for employing them in the first place)

Several mainstream media sources have pushed the narrative that Donald Trump’s 2024 victory was a result of “the patriarchy” and a resurgence of male-dominated political influence. Here are a few examples:
• CNN: Argued that Trump’s appeal to “traditional masculinity” resonated with disaffected men who feel left behind by modern social movements.
• The Guardian: Claimed that the election outcome was fueled by “rampant misogyny” and the rise of online male-dominated spaces (the “manosphere”).
• MSNBC: Suggested that men overwhelmingly voting for Trump is a sign that America is backsliding on gender equality.
• The New York Times: Linked Trump’s victory to a reactionary push against feminism, where conservative men sought to “reclaim power.”
• Vox: Blamed “toxic masculinity” and the influence of online male influencers for energizing Trump’s base.

These narratives argue that the 2024 election wasn’t just political but also a cultural battle between modern feminism and traditionalist masculinity. Do you believe this played a significant role in Trump’s victory, or do you think this is just media spin?



This framing ignores key factors like the economy, border security, and crime—issues that impacted all voters, not just men. Blaming “the patriarchy” for Trump’s win seems like a way to dismiss legitimate concerns from his supporters rather than engage with why he was elected. It also conveniently ignores the fact that millions of women voted for Trump too—which doesn’t fit the “patriarchy” narrative.

What do you think? Did Trump win because of male dominance, or is this just media spin?

• Eva ❤️

When issues like domestic violence, false accusations, and father’s rights in family court are raised, they are often dismissed or ignored. Some believe the media chooses not to report on men’s struggles because it doesn’t align with a broader social narrative. Others think men simply aren’t viewed as victims. Why do you think this happens?
- Eva ❤️