Search Results: if you could change a law

The Trump administration released new guidelines Wednesday for how universities and K-12 schools should handle complaints of sexual assault and misconduct as part of a contentious overhaul that Education Secretary Betsy DeVos launched in 2017.

Now, under reworked federal rules, alleged student perpetrators will have added protections, including the presumption that they are innocent throughout the disciplinary process and the right to be provided all evidence collected against them. Those students can also cross-examine their accusers and vice versa during live hearings, although it must be done through a lawyer or representative.

Under the Obama administration, the definition of sexual harassment was less specific — described as "unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature."

But the meaning has become narrower, using the Supreme Court's definition of harassment. The misconduct must fall under certain categories, including unwelcome conduct that is "so severe, pervasive and objectively offensive" that it "denies a person equal access to the school's education program or activity."

The way i see it, the current rules suck, all a woman... and yes its only women in college that have this power.. All a women need do is make the accusation. She needs no evidence, she needs no proof, no witnesses, nothing, and the accused is expelled from school. The most evil part of this, there were stories about a man who was passed out drunk, and he woke up to a girl having sex with him, he made a report, and was expelled, because the girls report had more merit even though he had witnesses and the like.. There are literally thousands of law suites against these schools because they failed to obey due process.. I see this as a welcome change.

As always attached is a direct link to the new rules going into effect August 12th.
https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/titleix-regs-unofficial.pdf

Criminals, such as drug cartel leaders, rely on society to be weak and they receive huge rewards in wealth and life quality of life to treat others horrifically. To a narcissist, it is better than living poorly as a slave to society. The punishment... generally jail time. A good deal for someone who lacks empathy and relys upon the compassion of others when they have none. It's just manipulation of sick people.

Would it help to have horrific deaths for such criminals, either pre assigned or by random selection?

Example submitted by jury:
Juror 1: Fed to sharks
Juror 2: drop from airplane, no parachute
Juror 3: ?
Juror 4: Abstain, opposed to death penalty... I love all people
Juror 5: dropped into volcano
Juror 11: Death by alligator
Judge:

Forget about "cruel and unusual punishment". Laws were meant to be changed and we aren't as civilized as you'd think if we have multiple wars in the last century... "fire bombing" and wiping out hundreds of thousands in a few hours. A lot of these deaths have befallen innocent people, so can't be so bad right?

What horrible death would be fitting an awful crime you can think of.

Would this idea make a good movie?

Lastly, to focus on the positive: What are some ways you can be a good person?