Search Results: curves

It seems like women are throwing around the word "curves" to refer to their fat folds. Curvy used to refer to a big butt and big boobs, but now the word can be misinterpreted as being a fatty.

For example, in March last year when the lockdowns started I was one of the people who would say that we should not accept the lockdown because if we do they'll keep locking us down whenever they feel like it, with any excuse they can think of. Many people called me paranoid and they'd tell me that it was "just two weeks to flatten the curve". Yet here we are.

I said that we shouldn't accept masks because they'd force us to wear them, and that this plus the lockdown would be used as leverage to get us to accept other things with the promise to return back to normal. I said that we'd have our privacy invaded, and our bodily autonomy. I said that it would probably lead to some kind of mandatory vaccination. Those people said "it's just a mask, what's all the fuss about? There won't be any mandatory vaccinations, don't be stupid". Now we're being told that we might have to have vaccine passports in order to regain our freedoms, and people will take the vaccine and accept the passports because they want to return to normal.

If we ever do return to normal, since they're saying that we might need to keep masking and social distancing for years even if we do get the vaccine.

Then there's this one. This one is something even I mocked.

And yet here we are this week:

It seems to me like most people continue to disregard conspiracy theories even if they're true. Do you change your mind or no?

I've been saying for 20 years that I thought both Dark Matter and Dark Energy were science fraud, and now more and more scientists are starting to feel the same way. It' sa shame people won Nobel Prizes for this junk science with no evidence whatsoever to support the claims. I can prove that the Dark Energy dataset is not better than 1 sigma, even if it is not a fraud, but the scientific standard of "Discovery" is supposed to be 5 sigma in physics. So this is simply not acceptable and not Nobel Worthy. The team that made this announcement back in the late 1990's has committed fraudulent science and needs to be barred from the community and possibly sued by the Nobel committee and various physics journals.

Same goes for Dark Matter. I can explain galaxy stellar rotation curves with no need for Dark Matter, using only Einstein and Newton's equations and ordinary, visible matter. If you do the correct N-body for a galaxy, you do NOT need Dark Matter to explain the orbital curves of the stars. I believe Dark Matter is an intentional science fraud.

Finally, Crab Nebula Supernova is not an Electron Capture supernova, it's an anti-matter supernova, a totally new class of supernova, and the Crab Nebula Pulsar is misclassified. It's supposed to be classified as a Magnetar, not an "Optical Pulsar". This nobel got awarded prematurely too.

The committee shouldn't give Nobels until after the award winner (s) are already dead, that way you would avoid most forms of science fraud and give the community time to verify the alleged "discovery" and rule out alternative explanations of the phenomenon. The way they do things right now encourages fraud and hoaxes.

What do you think about any of this?