Search Results: whats more appealing

This may bother some..
This woman is close to 40 now and she has college degrees. She committed the crime over 5 years ago. She fell in love with a man that her family did not approve of. She is a Muslim and for whatever reason they didn't approve. Her and him killed her whole family, I think it was six or seven people. Her parents, a brother that was not even two years old, grandparent or more than one grandparent, a cousin and possible other siblings.
They mostly had their throats cut and I think they may have been nearly decapitated. This story really Shook Me Up. India doesn't use the death penalty liberally. There are several other women on death row but I think it's less than 10. One more step and her appeals process was a failure and I think she's down to possibly one more appeal and a plea for clemency. It says she's likely going to be the first woman to hang since India became independent. I found this particularly shaking in it's efficiency.
Since the time slowly approaches, I don't know how long that is, I would think a year or 2 at minimum, the jail where she is to be hanged ordered 2 16 foot ropes. One for her and one for the man. Yes it noted their length.
They're supposedly special ropes and they're made by prisoners at one of the prisons. So they're preparing the death chamber. I included a poll below and I'm wondering how people see it. Do you support the decision of the Court or do you hope that she's given a reprieve.
She has a twelve-year-old son who ask for her to receive life sentence instead of death. That bothered me, poor child. If I wanted clemency for her that would be the reason. Her death will be quick and nearly painless compared to the pain that she inflicted. What a bizarre world we live in. I would hate to be in her shoes. But she also viciously killed her own family. I have to say that I'm in support of the Court I hope that they go through with it

There's two guys. Which one sounds more attractive, or dateable, to you? Please explain which of these two would make for a better partner and why. And yes, neither may appeal to you, but you have to pick the BETTER option.

Pros:
Treats you nicely and fawns you with compliments and sweet words.
Has a face you'd consider handsome/good looking.
Isn't funny per se, but can be "humorous." (Sometimes, "witty.")
Probably has most of the same interests you do.

Neutrals:
Describes himself as "shy and sensitive."
Politically, is very left-leaning.
A staunch atheist.

Cons:
Physically, is your height and weighs about 20 pounds more than you.
Treats almost every other male like a piece of sh*t (unless they are exactly like him).
Very immature, petty, and childish.
Still lives with his mother.
Unemployed or underemployed.

Pros:
Describes himself as "intelligent and rational."
Has a steady but impressive job.
Interesting to listen to and never boring.
Very hard-working, committed, and passionate about his life goals.

Neutrals:
Is always 100% honest , especially if someone (or you) is acting unreasonably.
Always gets remembered by other people, for better or for worse.
Apolitical.
Agnostic (non-religious, but non-atheist).
An introvert and doesn't hang around many people.
Treats every single person he meets the same way; respectful but disinterested.

Cons:
Is only a little taller than you (by one or two inches) and weighs at least 90 pounds more than you.
Not what you would consider to be "your type" or physically attractive (ugly, or has physical features you generally dislike in men).