Search Results: real age

Name the Leader of that Nation? He personally invented it.

Also, which ancient nation did he study who was already using Rally Fire and Rolling Retreat for Archaic ranged weapons around 1600 years ago, before Guns were invented?

What was the archaic weapon the previous question refers to, and why did that ancient nation have so much success with that weapon?

What percent of this man's army did Marksmen make up during the next war he fought, in which he tested his new Rally Fire and Rolling Retreat strategy? Give your answer in multiples of 5%.

Hint: It's less than 50%.

What were the primary weapons, other than Guns, which were used by both sides in that war? In approximately what proportion were they used by this man's army?

Hint: "Swords" is not the correct answer. Real Historians and Strategists know swords were already obsolete in warfare at least a thousand years before guns were even invented, except as a "Back-up weapon": in case your primary weapon was disarmed.

Did this man win the next war he fought in after this discovery, and how drastic was the victory or defeat in that war?

Who was the opposing nation in that war?

Hint: Both nations are in the answer key for the Poll.

Is the "Rally Fire" and the "Rolling Retreat" still a viable tactic/strategy in modern warfare with machine guns and rockets/bombs and stuff?

How many well-aimed shots per minute can a well-trained soldier fire with a muzzle-loaded gun?

I first encountered this information while further researching one of the Historical Notes in Age of Empires III game creation menu. You can learn a lot of real military history by playing Age of Empires III.

====
Unrelated Bonus Question:
During the biggest naval battle of the War of the Greeks and Persians, how many Persian ships were sunk by the Greeks in one day due to "Greek Fire" and other superior Greek weapons and strategies? This war and this battle were correctly prophesied by the Angel in the Book of Daniel.

A couple of days back when this cute co-worker of mine and I went to the store together, she called me love and started asking if I had any special needs (she clarified that the reason why she asked me the question was because we had a conversation slightly beforehand about her baby's tracheostomy issue; I answered her with the truth (as any real friend should), but while I didn't directly say I was autistic, I told her I was diagnosed with the disorder at age 3.

I've called her pet names like goddess, beautiful, babe, etc. But I didn't jump into the extremes. While she has continuously called me "love", I have refrained from calling her something more lusty, such as "sexy" or "shawty". She's certainly not single; she mentioned something about a husband of hers while in the car and called someone daddy. A day later, I found her falling in love with a fellow male co-worker (who is ALSO married with kids). They both are married (not to each other) with at least one kid of each of their own.

Personally, that pissed me off. But I acted okay with it, I didn't go snitching around like a bitch. She's in her high 20s, the dude is in his 30s, I'm only in my low 20s. I saw the dude and her behind closed doors in the main office; I didn't know WTF they were doing, but it seemed kinda sus to me. She called him handsome the day later and was flirtacious, sarcastic, etc etc. She was rarely like that to me. RARELY.

She said today that "we're gonna need to talk" (while we were at the lunch table with the same co-worker) and when he left, she asked me about work boundaries. She, in an indirect manner, told me that I must call her by her real name, and not babe or sweethart or whatever. But what's the point of that advice when she literally called me love? She even said something worse, saying there "might have been a miscommunication" when she gave me her number and that the number is for "work only." Well, she didn't apply this very same standard to the other co-worker!