Search Results: tall guys or short guys

As someone who's short and ugly, I strongly believe women judge men' physical appearances very harshly. While men may be more "physical creatures" than women, they also tend to not be too picky on looks and have more variety on what they like (short or tall women, skinny or thick, flat or busty, light or dark, blonde or brunette, etc.) While most women around the world seem to want the same exact archetype of man: tall, athletic, handsome, and ego brimming out the ass. Short men get NO love, and even the 4% of women open to same-height or shorter men would still rather have a tall man (6' and over) than a short one, if all else were equal.

The only thing women seem more open minded about is weight; more women are open to overweight guys (as long as they're "slightly chubby"/"dad bods" and not legitimately fat).

What do you think? I'm guessing this question will have a huge gender bias gap.

Girl A: Shorter, larger breasts, larger butt, sexy, goes partying, makeup all done, dresses provocatively
Girl B: Taller, smaller breasts, smaller butt, cute, simple, wears t-shirts, minimal or no makeup, plays sports

Would you rather be a man who is short (under six feet tall), overweight, ugly, unattractive, small-dicked (less than 7"), and seen by 90-99% of women as completely undateable, but a hard-working intellectual genius (let's just say, an IQ of 170), and one of the top minds in your field, albeit not rich?

Or would you rather be a 6'5" tall, buff, super handsome, super-attractive guy with a big dick (8 or 9") who's 'sexy' enough can get pretty much 95% of straight women on the market, but really dumb (like AOC levels of stupid), vapid, and shallow and basically useless to society intellectually?

And no, you can't just change your appearance or anything. You are stuck this way for life.