Guys, would you rather be short, overweight, and ugly, but a hard-working genius, or tall, super handsome, and attractive, but dumb and shallow?

[MCheetah]

Would you rather be a man who is short (under six feet tall), overweight, ugly, unattractive, small-dicked (less than 7"), and seen by 90-99% of women as completely undateable, but a hard-working intellectual genius (let's just say, an IQ of 170), and one of the top minds in your field, albeit not rich?

Or would you rather be a 6'5" tall, buff, super handsome, super-attractive guy with a big dick (8 or 9") who's 'sexy' enough can get pretty much 95% of straight women on the market, but really dumb (like AOC levels of stupid), vapid, and shallow and basically useless to society intellectually?

And no, you can't just change your appearance or anything. You are stuck this way for life.

Super-unattractive, short, ugly genius and visionary.

Super-attractive, tall, handsome male bimbo.

[GoldenAxer]

B is a no-brainer for me! The value of my life for me boils down to morality, I think. Can I be a decent person to my loved ones? Can I be a decent member of my community, ideally even a leader? I don't see being an antisocial genius as a way to achieve what I want, morally.

[GoldenAxer]

Well, my answer has some contradictions to your questions and it's a bit confusing. I might just say that I value social strength more than intellectual strength nowadays.

[GoldenAxer]

I can neither project my morals as a macho idiot or the most socially unpopular genius. But I think it's easier to be a decent man the former way. I want to be a decent man above all else.

[TheUniqueOne96]

Super-attractive, tall, handsome male bimbo.

I think life would be better compared to the other option.

[t-8900]

gonna have to say tall and handsome tbh. Life is cruel about stuff like this.

[worldscolide]

Dude im a weird combination of both.. I am tall, Somewhat overweight, But very hard working and incredibly intelligent... At least intelligent in the computer realm..