Search Results: high standards

like the 1-10 attraction scale, what number and above do they have to be for you to date them?
il take anyone above 2/10... pretty low since I’m ugly myself... beggars can’t be choosers lol

Most women seem to think they aren't picky/entitled, but almost every woman I've spoken to (besides a few realistic ones on here, like @JosyJosy, @DizzyDesii, etc;) SAY things that contradict that. They'll ask for Tony-freaking-Stark and then think they're not asking for perfection. And honestly, it gets annoying AF, especially when they complain about "being single," but reject 99.9% of the quality male population. They'll also do all of this while literally bringing nothing to the table other than having a vagina (not "giving up the vagina," just HAVING one). And then when some men like myself call out these entitlements, like the infamous "you can change weight, but you can't change height" counter-argument, they'll huff and puff, but never address said argument or see their demands as "unrealistic" and unfair.

By unrealistic standards; I mean:
- 6'0" to 6'4", minimum height.
- Ego brimming out the ass; enough confidence to wrestle a bear and 100% believe you'll win.
- Earns way more money than her, no matter who she is or what she does for a living.
- Immaculate gym body that requires at least 15 hours a week of exercise.
- Always put her needs first, but without coming off like a simp/beta, somehow.
- Buys her whatever she wants.

Realistic standards would be:
- Any height that isn't significantly shorter than her.
- Isn't too insecure or has realistic flaws.
- Has a job and can pay his own bills.
- Is relatively healthy, even if not in athletic shape, and at least weighs more than her.
- No history of abuse, cheating, crime, or STD's.
- Treats her well and respects her without disrespecting himself.

It seems like most women under 30-35 want the first set, and will only "settle" for the second set when they're too old.

But what do you think?