Search Results: new attitude

Feminism has told us there is this grand conspiracy against women, when in fact, women are the most catered to class of people in America. Evidence for this can be seen in the following:

1. Gender laws exist that legislate bias in favor of women. If you want equality, I suggest we get rid of Title 9 and Affirmative Action. The resume of men literally go in the trash for being male. That is real gender bias that effects males and families every single day of the year.

2. 93% of the people in prison are male. This is especially striking since women are the majority gender.

3. Women are given many preferential advantages in gaining high education. This can be seen that in the fact that now 60% of new college entrants are female.

4. Men literally go to prison for sex crimes against imaginary people. Women on the other hand can sleep with a male student and often get a misdeamnor and not put on a sex offender registry, while men always are given felonies and made sex offenders for life. If the male sleeps with a younger girl, he is so evil. If a woman does it, the male is very lucky. That is our attitude in this nation.

5. Women work the easiest jobs in society. Most work indoors. Most dont have to sweat. Lift.

6. Gender wage equality statistics are often wrong. They never compare people in the same jobs, with the same experience, and with the same education. When you do this, you see women actually make more than men.

7. American women live in the safest nation in the world.

So in the end, is there some grand conspiracy against women? I think not.

Employers are starting to ask for college transcripts. They are looking for socio/politically activist courses... social justice, radical political and religious ideology, gender, sexuality and race identity and similar non traditional-major courses that they feel might indicate attitudes hostile to their corporate philosophy and work environments. This would mean some graduates, potentially with $tens of thousands in student loans would be unemployable. Do you think that is justified or should the information be concealed from potential employers?

So I'm having to choose between two jobs soon, and I'm still in doubt. What do you think, and please explain your answer?

Job #1: a small (~10 people) developer with a very idealistic NGO cause which I support. They are offering me a 1-year contract to begin with. For this job I would have to move to another city where I've been quite a lot before but currently don't know anyone.

Job #2: a large insurance company where I get to design and implement new techniques. They are offering $500 (before taxes) per month more and have a more flexible attitude towards working times. For this job I can keep living in the city I live now.

Unlike the main roster Nxt builds guys up... its a place where a title is earned.
here's to why WWE WENT WRONG
not building guys up. the only guy they build up were the ones in the ruthless agression /attitude and golden eras... in the pg era they use guys from the indies who are built up already. Also pushing guys who dont deserve a title shot.
In 2009 They pushed cm punk from midcard to main event. even though he was in raw for not even a day. Guys who deserved the title like Carlito
Mvp
Shelton benjamen
Matt hardy
Jimmy wang yang
Chuck palumbo
Deserved itcway way more than cm punk who was a rookie at the time
But they pushed cm punk who at the time was a wwe newbie