Search Results: second change

Would you rather have nearly perfect genetics (tall, very good looking, perfect body with no upkeep, etc) but grow up dirt-poor in a third-world country, like Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ukraine, Serbia, etc? Or have bad genetics (not tall, ugly, obese no matter what, etc), but grow up as upper middle-class, in a first world country, like the United States, Canada, Australia, or The Netherlands?

You would not be able to change your life or circumstances until at least the age of 24. With the first scenario, you are a 9 or 9.5 out of 10 in full makeup and upkeep, but usually look a bit less than that because you're dirt poor, living in a third-world country. In the second scenario, you'll never be above a 4, but your parents household income is around $150,000 a year and they spoil you.

I understand that there's different kinds of junk food, but for the sake of the question, I'll divide them into two categories, sweets, chocolate, chips/crisps, doughnuts, things that are generally seen as snacks and the second categories are things that are seen as meals, likes burgers, fries, pizza, etc.

Neither of them are generally healthy, obviously and I understand that you can make healthier versions of at least some of them.

If you could pick either category to be healthy, which would you pick?

All foods from that category would become healthy to you, without the taste or texture changing and the other category would remain unhealthy.

Simply choose one or the other, so none of this 'both' or 'I can't choose', don't bother answering if that's the case, just pick one category.

Are there any unhealthy foods that you just love and can't resist?

I'd personally go with the meal options, because I crave that category more often, whereas with the other one, I don't it as much or I can at least control it much better, not that I eat either category often.