Search Results: we have nothing in common

To me it seems the very existence of the right relies on toxic messaging. Imagine where we would be if it weren't for Limbaugh convincing millions of normal Republicans to stay mad at his oxycotin-induced hypotheticals, for example - J6 couldn't have been possible without that accumulated decades of fake fury.

Meanwhile, the left only seems to engage in it either to fight fire with fire or, as is becoming increasingly common, because it's actually a right winger enjoying the anonymity of the internet for an easy false flag maneuver. I haven't seen anyone on the left who actually seems to enjoy toxicity the way the right seems to.

So, I think if we came up with an objective definition the right would just say it is biased against them and refuse to stop. Because it is true the right would be nothing without toxic messaging, so in a way a truly objective definition would be biased against the right.