Search Results: controlling hormones

I don't think women are cut out for direct combat roles and I say that as a former US Infantry Marine. The Marine Corps allowed women to join the infantry and specifically went out of their way to select the most badass female Marines to try out for infantry training battalion. Want to know what happened? They pretty much all failed out because the Marine Corps refuses to lower their training standards.

How about biology? You can't deny facts. Do you know how heavy it is to carry a full pack with a rifle and plate carrier for days on out in the field? Do you understand that men have more upper bodystrength and are overall more resilient to strenuous physical stress? How they can control recoil and their weapons more effectively because of this? How testosterone the primary male sex hormone plays a major role in all of this? How women will have issues in the field due to menstrual cycles? How if captured by the enemy, they would be brutally raped again and again and again and again? How this would cause major issues with unit cohesion?

I have a huge issue with this because I have friends who have been killed in combat due to other people's inability to do their job correctly. Women are nothing but a liability in direct combat roles and it's been proven evidently true because of the fact that they couldn't even get through our training.

Feminist can go be crazy in whatever way of their choosing without getting any rise out of me, but when they start getting good men killed in combat just for some political agenda or just overall point... well, that's when I have a huge issue. It's the most selfish thing I've ever heard of. These people who support this need to get their head out of their ass, and stop thinking about themselves and their godamn political agenda or whatever point they're trying to prove... and realize it's not all about them. They're stupitidy is going to result in good men killed in combat because they want to prove a fucking point.