Do you think OJ killed Nicole simpson?

[Anonymous]

well he was found not guilty

[abc3643]

While I do suspect Simpson did it, I agree with the criminal trial jury's acquittal of him. The prosecution was overly confident and they made some fatal flaws that put reasonable doubt in the jury's minds and, thus, OJ was acquitted. Had I been on that jury, I would have acquitted him also.

If you are old enough, you'd remember "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit." which is a major reason why he wasn't convicted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16KaoVmVTPE

[Hulk_kitty]

its very possible he did kill her, The police were absolute idiots when it came to tampering with the evidence, that's why he got found not guilty. If the police followed all the correct procedures to handling evidence, he would definitely be found guilty.

[babycowboy]

oh i love this question. yes, i do believe he killed here he just had really good lawyers that found a way to set him free but he 100% did it. what’s your opinion?

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

100% yes. All the evidence points to him.

And jury should be a panel of judges because common civilians aren't smart enough to understand court proceedings and evidence as proven with O. J. Simpson case and many others more.

[abc3643]

No, not all the evidence points to him. If you were old enough to watch the case on TV instead of watching Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers or some shit like that, you'd understand that.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

@abc3643: I have seen evidence of the case. Points directly to O. J.

Only a moron like most juries are would think otherwise.

[abc3643]

Apparently, you didn't watch the trial. Look at the excerpt I posted. The prosecution claimed the murderer left gloves at the murder scene (and that may be true or they may have been planted). But the fact that the prosecution wanted OJ to try on those gloves in evidence and they did not fit was a fatal error in their case. The gloves didn't fit, thus he was acquitted because that introduced doubt since the prosecution was apparently in error. Furthermore, there was evidence of racist cops on the case and that introduced doubt in the jury as well.

The prosecution did a shitty job and that's why OJ got off.

But the fact that the gloves didn't fit is one example of NOT ALL the evidence pointed to OJ.

Thus, the acquittal because of sufficient doubt.

That's how criminal trials work.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

@abc3643: I don't have to watch no damn trial to know he murdered two people. The evidence speak for itself.

O. J.'s blood at the crime scene, his fresh cut on his finger since he used a big knife to murder, his bloody clothes, one of the murder glove on the roof of his house, a lot of blood on the interior of his car door panel and drop of blood on the exterior door.

The glove didn't fit is BS. O. J. just extended his finger wide and barely even tried to put the glove on the jury of idiots felled for it.

As I said most juries aren't smart enough to understand count proceeding and evidences and attorneys know that as they are experts and trained in manipulating and distorting things to confuse a jury.

A panel of judges know all the tricks attorneys use to gain advantage and understand evidence so they won't be easy to trick and confuse unlike an average Joe that doesn't understand ish being part of jury.

Lastly, the American system of justice is extremely flawed.

99% evidence can point to guilt but a slight doubt of anything means not guilty. Unbelievable.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

Fast-forward to 25 minutes if you don't feel like watching the whole video.

OJ blood DNA is at the scene of the crime.

https://youtu.be/sE4ZCFe9Yyg?si=t46udJiVej8yV46J

[abc3643]

I think you missed my point.
I didn't say OJ didn't do it... in fact, I strongly suspect he did... My point is that not "all evidence" pointed to him doing it. The fact is that some evidence raised doubt... enough doubt that "beyond a reasonable doubt" of guilt was not met and, thus, he was acquitted.

[XXblack88]

yeah I do

[BarryLiverstone]

Who is OJ?

[XXblack88]

a football player

[BarryLiverstone]

Ok, did he play last year?

[XXblack88]

no he play from 1969 - 1979

[BarryLiverstone]

That long ago? Then why ask.

[XXblack88]

yeah, it is. You wanted to know who he was.

[BarryLiverstone]

Ty for letting me know

[BLP11520]

He did