Is Charlie Kirk truly spreading hate, or is his legacy misunderstood?

[Anonymous]

[abc3643]

He wasn't spreading love...

Remember what he said...
https://www.mediamatters.org/charlie-kirk/charlie-kirk-its-worth-have-cost-unfortunately-some-gun-deaths-every-single-year-so-we
"You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won't have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It's drivel. But I am -- I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational."

And, remember the last thing he ever said during that event in Utah...
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-yes-charlie-kirks-000400919.html

ATTENDEE: Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years?

KIRK: Too many. [Applause]

ATTENDEE: In America, it's five. Now, five is a lot, right, I'm going to give you — I'm going to give you some credit. Do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years?

KIRK: Counting or not counting gang violence?

He was then shot in the neck and died quickly bleeding-out profusely.

The last word he ever said: "Violence".

Well, I'll give him credit: He died exemplifying the very words he spoke:
I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights.

[abc3643]

frederickjoseph.substack.com/.../the-guns-eulogy-for-charlie-kirk

[Anonymous]

Nobody but God can tell you Charlie Kirk's heart. I know there was a time (not very long ago) when Charlie was completely secular, and his message had NOTHING to do with God. So whether He found God or whether God was just a means to and end for him I cannot say. I will say this though, I personally don't feel his words were the words of man who found God though.

[Nikki1989]

One simple Google search will bring up 100s of hateful comments from that horrible excuse for a human being.

[NoDecision]

How was he spreading hate? Just because he was smarter than his critics?

[Asker]

I was asking because some people believe he spread hate and other don’t believe that

[AI Opinion]

Charlie Kirk definitely fuels a lot of division 😶‍🌫️

His style is confrontational, very “us vs. them,” and he often uses loaded language about liberals, immigrants, LGBTQ+ issues, etc. That tone encourages hostility, even if he personally claims to just be “telling the truth.”

People who agree with him tend to see him as brave and misunderstood. But for many others, especially marginalized groups, his rhetoric feels harmful rather than just “controversial.”

[Anonymous]

Everyone has a different opinion and I have viewed some of his videos posted by his own YouTube account (so not a biased source) and I didn’t have a good impression of him to be honest.

[Danny_dan92]

He’s dead, how can he actively be doing anything?

[Asker]

I’m talking about when he was alive

[Danny_dan92]

Oh, he wasn’t. He was doing the thing that many people are incapable of doing which was respectfully debating people.

As the saying goes “may the best man win”

This saying applies to debate, in the form of the audience deciding which argument is more compelling. More often than not, he made more compelling points on topics, and it shows because his support continued to grow… that’s not spreading hate. That’s simply being correct

[Asker]

Thanks

[Danny_dan92]

Yep.

[Anonymous]

Is? You mean was.

[Asker]

Some people have different views

[Mike_Hum]

He did not spread hate.

[Ariesman81]

Keep questioning 👍🏻