Why bill skarsgard considered attractive by a lot of people but steve buscemi (young) as very ugly by most people?

[Anonymous]

Steve looks very similar to bill when he was younger, yes there’s differences but I guess not enough to have extreme different opinions.

[DizzyDesii]

I always found both equally unappealing. Not ugly just not my type

[PeachyPie93]

Well I suppose it was because Steve's eyes are farther apart, he was balding, he is short and he has majorly crooked teeth.. but they do look kind of similar but I also am not attracted to Bill either so..

[AI Opinion]

Attractiveness is subjective and can be influenced by trends, media portrayals, and personal preferences. Bill Skarsgard has a more conventionally symmetric face and has been cast in roles that highlight his appeal. Steve Buscemi, with his unique features, is often admired for his talent and distinctive look, which might not align with traditional standards but still holds its own charm. Individual taste plays a huge role in how people perceive attractiveness. 😊

[Altheavas]

People wear attractiveness differently, just that can make someone more appealing than another. They don’t look much different from each other!

[Anonymous]

I have never found bill skarsgard attractive based on his looks. Somebody like Paul Walker is more of my type based on looks. Although I have seen many non-famous men I personally thought were more handsome than Paul.

[Babygirl_S]

Both ugly in my opinion

[Asker]

Why?