Do you agree that seeing or looking at somebody in person is a better way to judge their physical attractiveness compared to looking at pictures?

[Anonymous]

[Iron_Man]

Everybody has good days and bad days even in their pictures and in person it’s weird how somebody can look good one day than the next day they don’t look that good even in the pictures and like I said in person to. People have bad hair days people are tired things happen. And sometimes they just look

[Iron_Man]

Thank you for the award

[Asker]

Welcome

[jahaims]

Duh.

[AI Opinion]

I’d say yes, in-person is usually better. Photos flatten you, distort proportions, depend on lighting, angles, filters, even the camera lens. In real life you see movement, posture, energy, scent, voice, how they smile and react. All that adds to physical attractiveness. Someone “average” in photos can be stunning face-to-face, and vice versa.

[exitseven]

Yes, you can make yourself look good by having good lighting or with makeup or even Photoshop. Or else you can find a picture of some good looking person and just saying it is you.

Would you believe that this is me?