Do you agree that if being a billionaire is not enough to make a women happy then the average guy is screwed?

[Anonymous]

The truth about marriage 💍 pic.twitter.com/rg4SZN4zbM

— Zherka (@ZherkaOfficial) August 29, 2023

Guy pretty much lays it out. You got men like Tom Brady who are billionaires, good looking and best in their field who can't keep their women happy and end up divorce. So what hope is there for the average, guy in keeping today's modern day women happy, who constantly need social media validation, looking to trade up and always wants more and more?

Yes

No

[blackgaletiger]

Millionaires and billionaires dont make their money just like that. Al lot of investment goes into the money they make. Relationships are no different. If you put all your stocks and investment in one particular thing then you can’t complain about not achieving maximum outcome. If your goal is to make a woman happy or any person in general happy then give up because because you can't invest in an illusion. If you invest in keeping her balanced and making sure the needs are meet and reminding them that the needs are meet then large sums of money is irrelevant. Its not about how much you have but how you use what you have to work with. If you say that what if she is not content with her needs then she devalued her assets and its not worth the investment

[BoopBoopBeep]

All the women I've seriously dated gave up social media (either before or because of me). Makes a world of difference.

[LiLee77E]

Billionaires are either born into money or they excel at business. Business involves relationships and decisions that are often the opposite of what’s needed to make a romantic relationship work, and last.
Billionaires have problems that relate to having that much money.
People who have less money have problems that relate to their amount of money, lifestyle, etc.

[normalice]

Or, have you considered the possibility that the alt right red pill weirdos were wrong about women just wanting money?

[BarryLiverstone]

Asker said it’s not a red pill take tho

[normalice]

Sure, but thats exactly what a red pill weirdo would say 🤷

[BarryLiverstone]

Are you serious? It doesn’t take money to make someone happy

[Asker]

money dispute/problems is one of the most important reasons couple divorce.

[BarryLiverstone]

Financial responsibility is an important skill to learn yes

[BarryLiverstone]

You didn’t answer my question yet

[Asker]

Yes I am serious. And while money doesn't guarantee happiness, it definitely leads to becoming happy.

[BarryLiverstone]

Less than 1% of the population are billionaires. So if you are serious then 99% of people can’t be happy

[Asker]

You seem to have missed the point.

[BarryLiverstone]

I got the point, it’s also a red pill lie.

[Asker]

if you did then u wouldn't have been giving stats about billionaire.

[BarryLiverstone]

What you asked about it a red pill concept and meant to discourage guys from connecting with and trusting girls. I got the point and i choose to disagree with it.

Also divorce stats are more complicated than the surface suggests.

[Asker]

This isn't some redpill take. Money dispute/problems is a real problem for divorces among couples. We have men who have tons of money and are better than the average guy that still ended up divorce. This is asking men to seriously look at if they can do better after better men have failed.

How are you this dumb and not getting it?

[BarryLiverstone]

Because you start out talking about billionaires. Did you want to ask about billionaires? That’s why I said what I said

[Asker]

I mention billionaire but that wasn't focus. The focus was that better men failed, what does the average guy has? It's like seeing a pro MMA fighter get knocked out by a guy and thinking the average guy has a better chance.

[BarryLiverstone]

The average guy gets the average girl

[Asker]

We aren't talking about getting girls. We are talking about keeping them.

[BarryLiverstone]

Yes I know. And that’s why I initially said it takes more than $ to keep someone

[strateguy632]

2nd.,