What would happen if hitting below the belt was allowed?

[N192K001]

Not sure.

Whatever the case, I'd think it would depend on the individual skill of the martial-artist. Whoever has the superior defensive-capacity might survive more, regardless of sex.

From what I've heard and read, though, women also have a 1strike-neutralization point, too: 2 of them, actually; some pairs being larger targets than others; and generally regarded as eye-catching in & of themselves. While their sensitivity & aesthetic-value is generally considered to be common-sense to most, their offensive-/defensive-value as strike-targets doesn't seem as well-known from what I've seen so far.

If this became as widely-known as the male-counterpart, the nut-cracker strike's massive advantage (if/when executed effectively) could be neutralized.

[boggboss]

What are u talking about sorry where are u fighting

[Beatrice1865]

No, because women can still be hit below the belt. It’s just as plausible to drop a woman with a single groin kick as it is to drop a man.

[Iron_Man]

That would only give you 20 to 30 seconds of downtime if you can’t finish them up by then he will come back and hurt you badly

[SuccessfulHornDog]

LOL, I am curious how susceptible females are to a crotch shot. How much would it hurt them compared to a guy?

[Anonymous]

I don’t think so. Getting hit in the nuts hurts but it is exaggerated in movies etc...

[Anonymous]

Well that depends, what contact sport do you do? MMA, Karate, BJJ, or wrestling? Depending on the sport guys would still win mostly but the style of the sport still affects the outcome I think.

[Agape93]

Still posting nutshot questions?

[Anonymous]

I'm sure that would make a difference