Most animals don't bring us benefit so we should just hunt them. agreed?

[strateguy632]

look at most mammals: the few that benefit us we 'use' milk and wool. but most mammals and other animals just "Eat each other, make a new useless litter (double meaning!) sleep, and repeat" it all the same again! for nothing!

why are people trying to preserve nature? that has no benefit.

and the carnivores are HARMFUL to humans and the animals- that nature lovers lie- they want to protect! but don't protect from carnivores?

we should just video tigers etc. to see and hunt the carnivores so they don't hurt the food. and same for the plant eaters that harm trees and bushes and same for most insects and other species that have no benefit. so why not?

[choco-latte]

No because their sole purpose is not to benefit us. They help the planet in different ways, for example tarantulas eat bugs and without them the planet would be big infested. They also have a right to live their lives in their natural habitats. As long as we keep population of species regulated enough so that they don’t overpopulate then I think we should let them live in peace.

[_Jenny_]

@strateguy632 no, leave them alone

[strateguy632]

try to be logical. you love trees. why do you let giraffe hurt it? because you love giraffe? why do you let carnivore hurt it?

[_Jenny_]

@strateguy632 thank you for the MHO

[exitseven]

the thing about the ecology is that once you start messing with mother nature it tends to mess back

[exitseven]

Thanks for the MHO😎

[dudeinohio]

The balance of nature has to be maintained. All have their purpose.

[strateguy632]

really? all? so when one species is extinct everything collapsed?