Polls

We've seen many times, that there are some significant differences between American English and British English.

Did you know that the same word FANNY has completely different meanings between the two?

In American English, the FANNY is a person's rear end, their buttocks, what British English calls bum.

In British English, the FANNY is the person's front, more typically, and pejoratively, the female genitalia.

Which meaning of FANNY do you use in your country?

Please vote in the poll.

Maybe this is why a Fanny Pack is sometimes worn on the front, and sometimes on the back.

Like how to improve humanity had been based around religion for a long time, particularly Christianity and how to live like Christ. Wars were even fought over that. But not anymore. Instead, we debate political concepts today, such as what you see on GAG. Heck, the Vietnam war was a war between political beliefs, not religious ones. But the debate over how to improve humanity continues. It is just done politically instead of religiously. What do you think?

So congratulations! The very last thing you ate you now have a lifetime supply of! What did you get?

i got chicken bytes from habit grill! Lol 😂

🥃 Charlie Kirk debated with Oxford Union on May 13th, 2025 where he argued that what he called a “hyper-feminine” or “hyper-feminized” society would be weak and unsustainable 🥃

May 13, 2025, within the storied chamber of the Oxford Union, a pointed exchange on culture, strength, and the future of Western society unfolded as Charlie Kirk presented his case against what he described as a “hyper-feminized” social order. Framed as a warning drawn from history rather than mere rhetoric, the argument contended that civilizations endure when resilience, duty, and balance between complementary virtues are preserved. Admirers saw a defense of tradition and stability; critics viewed it as an oversimplification of complex social change. Like many debates staged beneath Oxford’s vaulted ceilings, the moment became less about a single speaker and more about a widening divide over how modern societies define strength, responsibility, and the path forward.

Charlie Kirk proves a hyper feminine society is always a losing option at Oxford - https://youtu.be/U6IoyvIGU3Y?si=9Npk9UR0cdTlGkN3

Patriarchy News Facebook Page - www.facebook.com/.../?mibextid=wwXIfr

I know Sarah Palin got skewered for saying she could see Russia from her house. AOC said Venezuela is south of the equator. And her response to the question of whether the USA should send troops to defend Taiwan if attacked by China was babble.

Last year Aaron Judge won the MVP. He was the best player by statistics. However, Cal Raleigh was a major reason Seattle made it to the playoffs. Also, why they took Toronto to Game 7 in the ALCS. So it could be argued that he was more valuable than Judge was. The Yankees didn't rely on Judge's success as much as The Mariners did on Raleigh's. So do you think it should go to the best player, or the one who had the biggest benefit to their team?

VP Vance threw Carrie Prejean , a Catholic, off the Religious Luberty panel for speaking out about Israel's murder of Innocenr Palestian Women and Children and Zionism. The whole point was to speak out freely about religion.

So who will be left to vote for Republicans in 2026? Trump has pissed off Catholics , American Jews, Independents , Democrats , Women, Black People, Gays, Trans, Hispanics, Young people, Arabs. Indians , and Native Americans. Are their enough White males for Republicans to win in November?