Dont you think zakir naik is not rational?

[JasonOrlove]

A muslim Told me that david wood uses laptop for reference that means he is not qualified to debate zakir naik and he is not good apologetics. Meanwhile zakir naik is good apologetics

[contentious]

Apologetics is all about the logical defense of truth. In order to logically analyze a religious text, you should have it in front of you to conduct a detailed examination. If you are going to make claims about a religious text, you should open that text and display it to the audience and then prove your case to said audience. Placing evidence in front of a court is an important part of making a case. If you just use rhetoric, but can't back up your claims then you're not making a very strong case.

[contentious]

It doesn't surprise me though... Muslim "scholars" are Sufis otherwise known as Sofists... Sophistry today is used as a pejorative for a superficially sound but intellectually dishonest arguments. That's what Islamic scholarship is all about. It's about spinning lies to confuse the uneducated.

[contentious]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pLshDsK-Vw

[strateguy632]

Using a computer allows precision. Sounds like naik is scared he will lose. He should bring his computer too, insted of fled away!

[jshm2]

David Wood is an incompetent - even with a laptop.

Naik isn't on the level of Deedat - but is still a decent scholar.