Search Results: being an individual

My campaign: A balanced and trustworthy election. The removal of mail in voting while making absentee ballots less restrictive and well known. A set budget for every presidential candidate provided by the government and raised through taxes. This reduces lobbying and corruption while promoting an effective use of limited funds... maybe we can get presidents that can save money rather than spend it.

Social and economic strength by promoting a better society starting with the children. Promote the individual to improve the group through curriculum changes including 6 school days a week, language classes in the early years to include multiple fluent languages by high school, the building of a strong work ethic and social standing by requiring club activities every year while in school as well as government and unpaid internships for students to experience the work place early on.

Media and big business had no say in politics and exist to export faces and products. I do not care what Nike think of the current or future presidents all I want are shoes. I would enact laws to prevent businesses from being able to set political views in the public. Also I would force news outlets to classify as new or otherwise based off information released. The news outlets were to biased during the elections and have been a major cause to violence and division by printing stories that have been untrue or unconfirmed. Maybe laws to hold the reporters themselves liable.

I do not fall within traditional republican, democrat, liberal, or conservative classes. I have strong feelings about freedom, abortion, corruption, government, big business, schooling, society, and news and social media’s.

Ask me your questions below and then vote if a president of this nature would be a good candidate.

An impromptu question. Say you had a young child around the age of five or six, and they wanted a doll for their birthday. Would you give them a regular normal Barbie doll, or the supposedly "realistic" one? The child has no preference and just wants *a* doll.

I personally think this doll looks frumpy, overweight, and gross; and I *like* thicker women! But *this* doll looks horrendous; no one aspires to be mediocre in society. They could've made an Ashley Graham doll or an actual attractive-looking plus-sized doll. But it looks like they just used the first short, ugly, chunky woman who whined about Barbies and that this doll was made purely out of one individual's own ego.

The male doll is somehow even worse! A short, divorced soy-boy with Dad Bod and a receding hairline at age 30. This is seriously the most effeminate looking "male" I've ever seen made into a doll. I don't like to judge, but what the hell is this? This looks like something the mom would give the child out of spite towards the divorced father instead of actually letting him see his kid (s). "Here. He's close enough to your father. Have fun."

I don't have a problem with a different variety of dolls out there, but 1) these were made to spite Barbies and other types of "unrealistic body" dolls, hoping to replace them, so they were made out of malicious intentions, and not positive ones, because some feminists got jealous at a Barbie one day and find attractiveness and being cool to be "problematic."

And 2) I don't think "everyday people" look THIS bad. These dolls look sub-average. Worse than everyday people. And very specific, like they're modeled after someone, even if they aren't. But really, it's the first point that bothers me. They were made out of spite.

Anyway, which doll would you get your kid?