Search Results: changing positions

Open: These are my better Anonymous feature quality suggestions:

1.) Limit Anonymous content per user to one question/poll/Take per day per user and five responses per user per day (not counting replies on ongoing threads or replies to responses on their own questions/polls/Takes). Users would probably think twice about wasting their daily Anonymous content chances on various forms of spam.

2.) The Anonymous Age range should be updated as follows:

13 to 17
18 to 20
21 to 24
25 to 29
30 to 39
40 to 49
50 to 59
60 and Over

I believe this new age range breakdown is streamlined much better than it is now.

3.) There should be an Experience range added to all Anonymous content. My suggestion is as follows:

0 to 2
3 to 5
6 to 9
10 and Over

This way, users have this added tool to refer to when deciding whether or not certain Anonymous content is serious or spam.

Conclusion: These are all common sense additions and changes that should be implemented by GaG immediately. They would greatly reduce the Anonymous feature abuse we all see in the feeds every day.

If any of you have tweaks you'd like to add, please let me know and post them! Enjoy and thank you all in advance!

Disclaimer: Sorry GaG members, but I ran out of poll slots. If you want "No changes.", please state so below and explain your position. Thanks. 👍

I sometimes talk to strangers and at this point I think I have talked to enough people (and seen enough posts, here and otherwise) to say most are shallow, pretend people. To a point that it's a mild surprise to find someone even mildly nice/decent and not disappointing. Shallow to the core, passionless pretend people with no value to words. All the same. Is it a pessimistic view (or realistic)? I think I am in a comfortable enough position to not be nice, why be nice to strangers? To servants? To maids? Anyone? If they are all the same. I am open to change (really, if you have a good enough point) but for some reason I just don't think there is a need/reason to. I just don't understand.

*Not a rant, just an observation. I do agree there is potential but probably never going to mean much, in the future maybe but not today. So why treat people as if it's going to change anything? Why treat people as their potential and not as who they are (currently)? I am talking about adults not kids, this doesn't/does not apply to kids.

Do you think your kind/"'kind'" changes anything or makes any difference/impact?

Life should be simpler, should have been simpler if it probably weren't for this...