Search Results: Charlie Kirk

I support private ownership, entrepreneurship, and the ability for a private sector to exist and thrive. I denounce socialism, communism, and a distribution of weath as a go-to, defacto solution. However, I also do not believe everything should be privatized, as I support a mixed economy.

I do, however, believe there is a greed issue, and our youngest generations are not stupid. The "Own nothing: be 'Happy'" initiatives are predatory. Even Charlie Kirk said himself the lack of being able to have homeownership and real assets will radicalize a generation. In addition, when big tech companies conspire to spy on their customers while partnering with the federal government, this should send chills down everyone's spines.

I agree with Tucker Carlson that the Boomer generation has failed everyone. I agree with one of his guest speakers that everyone wants to grow their piece of the pie, but growing your piece by expanding your pie is the approach rather than consuming the rest of the pie (destroying everyone else's wealth at one's gain).

In addition, criminalizing homelessness when people can barely afford rent as they work multiple full-time jobs is inhumane and abhorrent. Enacting and enforcing strict zoning ordinances and preventing others from seeking alternative forms of housing, whether that be RVs or tiny homes, is disgusting. You either put up and remedy the housing issues or shut up and let people survive the way they see fit. I don't care how much of an eyesore it is to open your curtains in your McMansion and see a mobile home planted on the lawn next door. Your greed doesn't allow you to screw with others' living situations.

🥃 Charlie Kirk debated with Oxford Union on May 13th, 2025 where he argued that what he called a “hyper-feminine” or “hyper-feminized” society would be weak and unsustainable 🥃

May 13, 2025, within the storied chamber of the Oxford Union, a pointed exchange on culture, strength, and the future of Western society unfolded as Charlie Kirk presented his case against what he described as a “hyper-feminized” social order. Framed as a warning drawn from history rather than mere rhetoric, the argument contended that civilizations endure when resilience, duty, and balance between complementary virtues are preserved. Admirers saw a defense of tradition and stability; critics viewed it as an oversimplification of complex social change. Like many debates staged beneath Oxford’s vaulted ceilings, the moment became less about a single speaker and more about a widening divide over how modern societies define strength, responsibility, and the path forward.

Charlie Kirk proves a hyper feminine society is always a losing option at Oxford - https://youtu.be/U6IoyvIGU3Y?si=9Npk9UR0cdTlGkN3

Patriarchy News Facebook Page - www.facebook.com/.../?mibextid=wwXIfr

Homeland Security - x.com/dhsgov/status/2015115351797780500?s=46

Border Patrol Union - x.com/bpunion/status/2015108074080809189?s=46

One of these days, god forbid, a federal agent is going to be killed and people are going to celebrate just like they did when Charlie Kirk was murdered. For anyone claiming the agitator was disarmed before being shot, the gun the federal officer had in your little video there is black, standard issue, while the gun the agitator had was white. Would have been clear as day if they had disarmed him.

You come across a book that interests you that was written by an author you’ve never heard of, and you plan to purchase it, but before you do you notice the book is dedicated to Charlie Kirk. Does this deter you?