Do you agree or disagree with Charlie Kirk when he said a hyper feminine or hyper feminized society would be weak and unsustainable?

[SolitarySolace]

🥃 Charlie Kirk debated with Oxford Union on May 13th, 2025 where he argued that what he called a “hyper-feminine” or “hyper-feminized” society would be weak and unsustainable 🥃

May 13, 2025, within the storied chamber of the Oxford Union, a pointed exchange on culture, strength, and the future of Western society unfolded as Charlie Kirk presented his case against what he described as a “hyper-feminized” social order. Framed as a warning drawn from history rather than mere rhetoric, the argument contended that civilizations endure when resilience, duty, and balance between complementary virtues are preserved. Admirers saw a defense of tradition and stability; critics viewed it as an oversimplification of complex social change. Like many debates staged beneath Oxford’s vaulted ceilings, the moment became less about a single speaker and more about a widening divide over how modern societies define strength, responsibility, and the path forward.

Charlie Kirk proves a hyper feminine society is always a losing option at Oxford - https://youtu.be/U6IoyvIGU3Y?si=9Npk9UR0cdTlGkN3

Patriarchy News Facebook Page - www.facebook.com/.../?mibextid=wwXIfr

I agree with Charlie Kirk

I disagree with Charlie Kirk

[Miristheiss]

I agree and we are seeing it in society.
We have a society that worships pleasure and degeneracy above all. It is erasing its culture by mass immigration from competing cultures, the birth rate is in free fall, marriage in decline, rampant divorce, we are pushing to sex change children, we worship abortion, the culture coddles its most mentally unstable people like trans, trying to push that lunacy mainstream.

[NaultD]

You are only as strong as your weakest defense. The foundation or lowest level of our society needs the strongest support to sustain a better future.

You could kill off the lowest of our society but they start killing back. Double negative there. Or we can be nurturing and caring and build for the weakest the defenseless and from there grow higher from how strong the ground is.

[Dargil]

If you said that, I entirely agree with it. Feminism is becoming the principal reason for the decline of Western civilization. The best thing we can do is to quarantine feminism from our lives. Don't date them, don't marry them, don't let them teach your children, don't work for them. Do not even have sex with them. Too many Western women are completely infected with feminism. That's why it's best to look offshore into Latin America or the Orient to find a suitable wife.

[genericname85]

yeah but that's really a no brain statement. like you could probably make the statement putting whatever else behind hyper other than "feminized" and the statement would likely still be true. cause "hyper" indicates an extreme state and extremes are rarely a good thing.

[exitseven]

Men and Women are different for a reason. When you mess with mother nature she tends to mess back.

[Cidknee]

Nice. I like that.

[loveslongnails]

I would first have to care enough about what he had to say, which I did not, and still do not. Then I'd need to know what 'hyper-feminine" means, but again, it came from Charlie, so how wise can it possibly be?

[Cidknee]

Wise enough to outwit the largest university in the UK.

[loveslongnails]

@Cidknee I have no idea what that means, but I stick by my statement. CK was not a wise man, he just thought he was, and he conned a lot of people, just like his hero the Mango Molester.

[Cidknee]

No, I guess you are qualified to make such a deep judgment on two people that you hate. You think maybe your opinion is swayed just a tad?

[loveslongnails]

@Cidknee Nope. I didn't hate CK, I hated his con and his bullshit. Yes, I do hate Trump, and he is worthy of it. I also don't walk around telling everyone " I'm a Christian, but it's ok to hate ____________ so and so".

We've had this discussion before, you just choose to ignore it. My disgust for Trump is based on how he HAS behaved and STILL DOES behave, and how he treats people. That's what I'm "judging". Everybody judges behaviors because that's the ONLY thing we CAN judge, and his behaviors are VILE.

James Talarico says it best:

" ... don't TELL me what you believe. "SHOW me how you treat other people, and I'll tell you what you believe."

One look at how Trump treats other people and you know - he's no follower of Christ. He follows mammon. You're inability to recognize that is a "you" problem, not mine.

[loveslongnails]

* Typo: Your inability...

[lightbulb27]

don't have a strong opinion. I dig stronger chicks. Spiders seem to be doing ok with strong chick spiders...

not so sure about humans...

[CalmUntilAbused]

I do agree, but it really is hyper-obvious...

[Master_Debator]

I've seen how most women spend money and make decisions, so I think I agree.

[Mike_Hum]

Have you seen what happens in departments at work run by women?

[Pohjolan]

Agree more than disagree. Some small country protected by bigger powers could be hyper feminised but it wouldn't work in general.

[Cidknee]

I don't think I've encountered a topic that I disagreed with CK.

[beefcakebradybatson]

KKKUCKKK FIRKKK!!!

[Cidknee]

You really believe the lies of his "white supremacy" and racist ways. That's rich seeing that he was opposed to such things.

[beefcakebradybatson]

@Cidknee Nice try. He opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act as harmful to whites and openly questioned us blacks' intelligence

[Cidknee]

Do you understand WHY he opposed it?