Do you agree or disagree that feminism is an ideology that has had a demonstrably evil influence on society?

[Anonymous]

Big Red - the leader of Feminism

I agree

I disagree

[Sanser]

I agree that feminism is a good thing and seeks gender equality, but today there is a large sector of the movement that is using it to take advantage of men. In my country women have disadvantages in society due to sexist behaviors but they are superior to men when it comes to laws and economic aid, a woman will be subsidized with more money than a man if she starts a startup, they have early retirement, if a woman abuses a man the penalty is much less than if a man does it, now they want women to pay less to enter university courses where there are fewer girls and then where there are 27 out of 30 students who are women, as in medicine it is not done nothing. These and a thousand other things... It's very sad but the man has been a second-class citizen for a long time (at least in my country). A trans law recently came out that allows people to change their gender and many men changed their gender to benefit from these advantages. It is sad but being a man today is synonymous with being a criminal for a large sector of the population... very sad for my country. Hopefully men and women can enjoy the same freedoms and live together without rancor between us, like real femenism wants!

[Sanser]

I wanted to ad a link of the news about the trans law but it doesn't let me post it :(

[Lliam]

No. I totally supported the women's liberation movement. The restrictive laws and attitudes toward women were little better than racial segregation.
I think women should be able to pursue whatever they want to do.

The only feminists who are horrible are those bitter losers who hate and resent men. Their shit only resonates with "woke" weirdos, just as do the recent attacks on "being white" by certain loud activists, or the attacks against heterosexuality by radical LGBT activists.
But I don't think that shit has much, if any, influence on mentally healthy people.

So I don't think that feminism, itself, has had a demonstrably evil influence on society. On the contrary, I think it has been generally positive. I don't have much sympathy for patriarchal misogynists who can't find virgin wives to dominate.

[Potteplante]

I disagree, however I think the feminism movement has been hijacked by radicalised feminist who pushed radicalised feminsim which differs from feminsim.

Feminsim as an ideology, still holds value - the fight for gender equality, which I still support. (I'm an equalitarian) I celebrate the fact that men have 15 weeks earmarked paternity leave here in Denmark. Hopefully that will make it more socially acceptable, for fathers to bond and be more present with their child during early age. We need to push for better focus on men's mental health - men's suicide rates are often higher than women's. We need to put more effort into making men feel safe to open up about abuse and give them a support system.

[David_Kek]

When did this hijack happen?
Far back as 1912 when prominent feminist leaders like Emmeline Pankhurst were literally committing acts of domestic terrorism with their Suffragette bombing and arson campaign, or did it happen a bit later in 1914 when they resorted to shaming and assaulting men in the street because they weren't in uniform and hence were demanding men die for them when these men didn't have the right to vote either?
It always makes me laugh when you lot try to justify the acts of feminism as historically being about gender equality, because it requires you ignore pretty much everything else they did which doesn't fit the party line. 100 years from now women just like you will still be claiming that it's only in their time it's got a little extreme, yet back in 2023 it was all roses and equality.

You know why paternity leave is a thing? It's not for men's benefit, it's for said feminists that don't want to hurt their careers by having children. Men didn't ask for it. You know what men asked for? Default 50/50 custody following divorce. They asked for fair family and divorce courts that aren't biased towards women and discrimitory towards men. That's what men asked for in the name of equality. 50 points if you can guess what your lovely equality loving feminism thinks about that and has done for the last 100 years.

[David_Kek]

As for men's health and suicide rates, why do you feel the need to put the blame on men for not opening up in the first place? Seriously think about that, a man kills himself, and rather than think to yourself what happened in his life to reach that point, your default response is to merely put the blame on him for not speaking up and asking for help. Don't you think that's a little odd? It's almost like it doesn't matter if men ask for help or not, because society could genuinely not care less about them, always putting the blame of their problems back onto them. You know what happens when actors do a social experiment in public to play out a dv scene? The people rush in to protect the woman when she's being attacked. When they switch the roles however, that's not what happens. People point and laugh at the man being attacked, assuming he must of done something to deserve it like cheating on his misses or something. So kindly, shut up sweetheart.

[Bricealan]

@Pottenplante Good points, perhaps I should become a Dane... There was/is a need for gender equality, as I have seen women shit on in my own family... my mother was a prime example, and I should have beat the shit out of my dad when he was such a domineering ass.

[Potteplante]

@David_Kek this hijack did happen recently - within the last decade or two. Has feminsim not no wrong - absolutely not. Do I deny there are shithead feminists out there? No I do not.

- It is already for the man's benefits, the man can decide against to further HIS career instead of parenting his child and becoming more involved with their child. You know what that could lead too? That soceity WILL start to treat men who take part in being the primary caregiver as such. You know what that would lead too?

As I already said - then I'm not a feminist, I support the ideology of feminsim. The last 100 years? Well in my case - in 1975, I'm not doing the math, feminism lead women out on a strike against the social discrimination against women. That has led to a huge shift in how women in my country have been viewed - politically, it got our first woman president elected who kept that title for 16 years.

[Potteplante]

@David_Kek as for men's health and opening up, then I'm not blaming it on them but US - the soceity. You're quite a awful human being in my opinion. In no way have I implied that someone killing themselves is their fault. Because it never is. We need to make an effort for a man to feel SAFE to open up, make a change so they're HEARD - and give them a SUPPORT system. You need to read before you react in anger like this.

- again, you're really a angry, horrible person. I don't understand why you'd go to this extent of reply just to end with "shut up sweetheart".

Reply with a longer reply - ignore this, idc. This is the last you'll see of me.

[Anonymous]

real feminism no, only brought good stuff. the radical extreme feminism that that ic0nIc screeching lady is from is shit, and partially responsable for the culture war and all that stuff. if gamer gate never happened, the alt right wouldn't really be a thing and trump might have never been elected, and also if we never had people like that be given a microphone the left wouldn't be crazy or talking about how xie/xer pronouns are valid or how spreading your legs as a dude is sexual assault. like society would have been so so much better right now but nope thanks to them

[Screenwriter]

Sadly, as the BOT choice person seems to think, the changes for giving women startups more money and women more money than men to support families, etc., COMES from the sexism that has economically and educationally disadvantaged women for millennia. And when I say millennia, that's what I mean.

Who were the caesars in Rome? The pharoahs in Egypt? The heads of the Seven Tribes of Israel? Women? Were there women shepherds? Samson took down the temples and Delilah cut his hair. Though Delilah had a kind of power, her power was to destroy a man, not to aid or work with him.

By the time we've rolled around to the 19th century, a woman or two slip into the fields of medicine, science. In a rare university women were allowed. But in careers, women were relegated to supporting males in power. Nursing instead of med school. Teaching at grammar school and high school levels instead of as full professors in colleges. Why? Not because they weren't talented enough, but because the hierarchy that could've let them in, men, wouldn't allow it.

Women were supposed to stay home, have children and raise them. If they wanted anything more: to use their brains, or talents, to seek higher education they might utiliize, they were discouraged or downright prevented by fathers, and even mothers towing the male line, who didn't want them to have educations or careers, or other men with the same attitudes.

Women had small businesses and a few broke through and became millionaires in the early 20th century. But most women in the business world inherited roles from their fathers because those men had no sons, or inherited their fathers' money for the same reason.

In worst-case scenarios, women who inherited large sums, businesses from their fathers often had that taken over by husbands as soon as they married. Only very wise fathers would write up legally binding wills that did NOT allow a husband to take over or squander what he'd left to a daughter. A rich wife was a windfall for a lazy gentleman.

Because of community property laws, a rich woman could lose her wealth to a husband, just as palimony and other laws have enriched women more recently.

Blaming feminism for the pendulum swinging in the other direction to achieve parity and equity in areas where women still don't have the same promotion and salary opportunites is the same as saying white people are disadvantaged today because of equal opportunity programs for minorities. Minorities, again, have been redlined for as long as they've been around. The same is true for women.

The projection is that in 2056, in America, women will achieve pay equity. Wow. After I'm dead, most likely. Yet, pay equity is NOT equal opportunity.

When men realize that the societal changes require that the pie has fewer slices for them and always should have had at least the same amount for women, minorities, the handicapped, mentally disadvantaged, drug or alcohol addicted... ALL people who have been marginalized, ignored and downright shamed and kept out, maybe today's "poor men" cry will ebb.

And no transgender woman is choosing to change their body and entire life to get "all the advantages" women have. Being a trans person might satisfy someone mentally, but choosing that life is difficult. There is still little acceptance, much prejudice, and it is a life of taking hormones forever, and/or possibly having irreversible surgery, some of which doesn't work that well. Those same hormones can cause cancer in the long run for trans men or women.

Sure, there are women who take advantage of the current changes, just like there are welfare queens and all kinds of pirates who use any "in" to steal. But that is not the life of most women anywhere.

[DaveJord]

See you can say you are pro this and pro that... like I am pro BLUE. BLUE is my favor color... but I am not Anit-red... but I don't really care for red I LOVE Blue.

So, if you are a person that likes red, then you could rightly say that I am NOT pro-red. But if all I talk about is how much I LOVE BLUE, and how red is not as good as BLUE, or that red really takes a lot away from BLUE in many ways... then regardless of what I say it really starts to look and feel like I am anti-red even when I never say it. But all I do is promote is BLUE and raise awareness about is BLUE... and just point all the things out about BLUE that clearly makes it not red.

Some days all the feminists will have sons, and they will marry women... hopefully, as long as their mothers didn't turn them gay with their emasculating stances on things... and then maybe then these feminists will realize the monsters they have created, watching their sons being emotionally and mentally abused by these women.

[ObscuredBeyond]

https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/newly-released-emails-show-california-dental-director-altered-study-to-remove-negative-conclusions-on-fluoride/?utm_source=OneSource&utm_medium=Push

They're an example of this. Only, their manifestation of it in the mind is called Kate Millet's Disease by those with historical insight. Feminists are a sign of what fluoride toxicity cover-up can lead to.

[ManOnFire]

100% it has. We can try to say that once upon a time feminism was good, but it rarely ever was outside of the basic need for equal rights. The early white feminists in the 1800s didn't even think well of PoC or even Asians, and thought they were too ignorant to vote. During the suffrage movement in the 1920s, white feminists didn't even want their black maids to be part of the march, so they had them march in the back. In the '60s and '70s it was almost entirely about a woman's desire to have sex like men with the benefit of abortion as a fail-safe.

Nowadays feminism wants to define men in general as violent rapists and murderers through statistics, push multiple genders/sexuality on society, dominate Disney, use sideways malice towards men, and fight for abortion so that women can have careless sex as much as they want with no consequence.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

A little bit. This world is literally filled with bad philosophies and ideologies that can lead some astray if they aren't smart enough.

Feminism originally started with women seeking equal social opportunities i. e. vote, work and not being treated like 2nd class citizens in their own nation.

With time feminism has been hijacked by loud stupid women spreading BS that stupid people buy into but ultimately you can't blame an ideology which most people don't even follow seriously nor is feminism responsible if people willingly buy into their message, no more than Burger King is responsible if people are walking around overweight.

[cosmosis181]

Only in the West, particularly the USA, because their biggest weakness is a susceptibility to self destruct courtesy of propaganda. Vietnam proved that. Their sources of "information" come from celebrities and rappers. So if some actress comes out in support of something... then 50 million women there march lock in step with it too, without question. Akin to the SS marching to Hitler's orders. They have no idea culturally now just how similar they are. Other countries aren't nearly as blindly hardlined about it. 1. They travel more than Americans, so they have more personal experience from a global perspective. 2. Courtesy of #1, they don't derive all of their information from a local multimillionaire celebrity, taking it as the word of gold.

[KingslayerC]

"feminism" is too wide of a net. Sure, most modern feminists are bigots and damage our civilization, but that's not all of them and that's not all of their history. Plenty of modern feminists actually believe in equality and egalitarianism.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

And if it really is too wide then that just really proves that feminists just cannot really agree on each other about what feminism should be. You got plenty of meaning on what it is reducing feminism into simply just a label and all having one thing in common that is the idea that there exists a patriarchy that is detrimental to women hence why feminism exists to bring women higher in a world where both men and women face their own challenges and have their own benefits and detriments just making it a one-sided movement which cannot accurately be described as equality. If they really believe in equality then they should've just call themselves egalitarians or an equalist. But it seems like the word feminism is more important to them than advocating for equality itself.

[Reorx]

I think the communist's took inspiration from Hitler's words, "whoever controls the minds of the youth controls the future", they replaced workers party with gender. VERY insidious. Subversion also has a source, China. Everyone underestimates China.. they have a recorded history around 4 thousand years..

I'll also say corruption of nature has a source. All the "isms" are linked. Wars adapted into the psychological realm of "mind prisons". You don't need to enslave fools that enslave themselves willingly to conforming to a system that's reward / punishment structures the same as rats.

The human race has a choice; remain individuals or become a collective adherent to the needs of a few. Willful ignorance, consume, obey, the message is always the same.

[Reorx]

Some of us resisted:)

[Thatpearl26]

Feminism used to be a great movement. It used to be about giving women the same rights and treatment as men. Once we did have equality it got hijacked. Now it’s all about bashing men and calling them misogynistic. So many women claim that the world would be better without men. It just shows how uneducated they are. Women need men on earth. Without them society would fall apart. As it would if it was the other way around.

[Anonymous]

It's been a mixed bag. The early achievements of feminism... women having the right to vote, to be educated, to work, own property and be treated with respect... those were all good things.

But the intentional destruction of the nuclear family, the marginalization of fathers, the exponential rise in single mothers, the division of the sexes... all of those things have been evil and have had a devastating effect on western society.

[Kaneki05]

Oh right so women been able to vote, and having the right to work, along with abuse been illegal now as compared to the past were longs if the man was her partner no one really saw it as a problem.
That's all changed because clearly feminism is evil. Anyone who claims such nonsense is just a sexist wanting us to go back the stone age.

[Kaneki05]

It's not a coincidence, that more men agreed rather than disagreed it's because welp those men are by and far still sexist af.

[abc3643]

The mere fact that you can be online and bitch about feminism is illustrative of the successes of feminism. So, thank a feminist near you otherwise, "Get your pregnant ass back in the kitchen and fetch me a beer! And I want a blow job tonight so you better be ready or I'll beat you silly and there's nothing you can do about it."

[nastyb]

how is feminism evil?

maybe we should take away your right to vote and lock you in the kitchen make sandwiches and clean toilets all day then lets see how miserable you will be.

feminists had to BEG men to give women the right to vote.

[DudeDiligence]

That's not completely true. More men than women fought for women's right to vote, and more women fought against it than for it. Feminists were mostly begging women to support them, not men.

"While men were involved in the anti-suffrage movement in the United States, most anti-suffrage groups were led and supported by women. In fact, more women joined Anti-suffrage groups than suffrage associations, until 1916. While these groups openly stated that they wanted politics to be left to men, it was more often women addressing political bodies with anti-suffrage arguments. The first women-led anti-suffrage group in the United States was the Anti-Sixteenth Amendment Society. The group was started by Madeleine Vinton Dahlgren in 1869. During the fight to pass the nineteenth amendment, women increasingly took on a leading role in anti-suffrage movement."

en.wikipedia.org/.../Anti-suffragism

[nastyb]

@DudeDiligence

Why would there need to be a suffrage movement if women didn't have to beg for tbe right to vote? Why did women have to suffer for the right to vote? Clearly thst would only happen if men didn't respect women

[DudeDiligence]

The right to vote came with the responsibility to register for the draft and go to war. That is still the case today for men, but not for women. Most women didn't want that responsibility because they saw their role as mothers and homemakers as a higher calling than politics or national defense. As I said, most of the resistance to it came from women, not men. Please just study your history. It's all there.

[nastyb]

@DudeDiligence

women shouldn't have to fight in wars because women don't start wars. MEN start wars.

women are not physically built to go to war. but thats not an excuse to treat women unfairly.

there would be no men without the work of women giving birth and giving up their careers to raise children. show some respect.

[nastyb]

@DudeDiligence

women have always been second class citizens all throughout history for thousands of years. Patriarchy has existed for thousands of years. "Women being seen as inferior to men" has been around for thousands of years. YOU SHOULD STUDY SOME OF YOUR HISTORY.

[DudeDiligence]

Again, go back and reopen your history books. Historically female leaders have been more likely than male leaders to start wars.

www.eviemagazine.com/.../history-says-that-female-leaders-are-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men

But it's really beside the point here. The simple fact is that most women weren't begging men to give them the right to vote. Most women were against the idea and more men than women were for it.

[_piotr]

@nastyb
Women should fight because that equality is, everybody fights. Nowadays you do not need to be specially build physically. There is no need for heavy armour or sword. Take a light gun and fight.

Not only men start wars. Women queens and empresses were also waging wars like for example: Catherine the Great. Also men who fight wars are usually not the ones who started it. Putin started war in Ukraine so why do you think people on both sides fight if they are not the one who started it. Are you so blinded by feminist propaganda that it never crossed your mind that perhaps Ukrainians (both men and women) are fighting to protect their homeland and families? Not just, because they are 'evil' men so they love fighting.

Women were not treated as inferior for thousands of years. In fact there were times where they were treated as superior. Think about Titanic. How many men had to die because women were more important to be rescued than men. Society often views men as disposable.

[nastyb]

@DudeDiligence

Not all written articles are true. A simple link written by some random misogynist does not prove that females are more violent or more likely to start wars.

In fact, research shows that men are the more violent gender. Men are more likely to commit violent crimes.

[A quick glance at the statistics seems to tell the whole story: Men commit more acts of violence than women. The U. S. Department of Justice sponsored a National Crime Victimization Study in 2007. This evaluation found that 75.6 percent of all offenders were male and only 20.1 percent were female.]

science.howstuffworks.com/.../men-more-violent.htm

Men are also more likely to be psychopaths

Research has consistently found that the prevalence of psychopathy is higher in male offenders and prisoners than in female offenders and prisoners

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.../

[nastyb]

@_piotr

research has proven that men are the more violent gender. men are also more likely to be psychopaths than women. read the links shown above.

Women were treated as inferior back then. Women couldn't even have their own bank accounts until 1974. And women have been working jobs way before then.

It wasn't until 1974, when the Equal Credit Opportunity Act passed, that women in the U. S. were granted the right to open a bank account on their own.

www.forbes.com/.../

[_piotr]

And do you think all men could vote or study? For most of history king was assigned from God, and only a few men from aristocracy or very, very rich citizens could afford to study. Did you even know about French Revolution? In previous centuries life was hard for both genders and Springtime of Nations? Do you think queen Elizabeth I in 16th century had it worst than peasant man?

How can you even measure people's morality back then with your modern scale. Do you know that slavery in ancient Rome was considered normal? Do you know that before law was codified, the ruler judged people according to their whims and it was normal? Child labour was normal in 19th century. Do you realise that there were matriarchal societies during history in Asia?

You do not know history. You probably know a few selected events from Europe that confirm your feminist agenda.

Do you know that meny women and men loved each other? Social norms in major parts of the world were different, but love existed. Women weren't slaves.

It is same like in 100 years someone said that for the whole history adults and parents oppressed children, because children could not open bank account and could not work at factory in 21 century. It is absurd.

[nastyb]

@_piotr

black men could vote before women could vote.

it shows that women are seen as "less" than slaves.

a woman couldn't open her own bank account until 1976. Plenty of women worked years prior to 1976 only for their money to be deposited into a man's bank account.

100 years ago, girls didn't even get the chance to go to college. Colleges were filled with only men.

[nastyb]

@_piotr

[Do you realise that there were matriarchal societies during history in Asia?]

yea like 1-2% of Asian countries were matriarchal. 98-99% of all the countries in the world are patriarchal. Most countries are STILL PATRIARCHAL TODAY.

[_piotr]

Did you even tried to read and understand what I wrote? Ok. I do not have time to teach random people on Internet. Live in your fantasy world.
Here is something from your fellow feminists that will probably suit you. That should help you to victimise yourself and women even more:
1) How women utopia will be wonderful: witchwind.wordpress.com/.../
2) Sex with men is always rape: witchwind.wordpress.com/.../

[_piotr]

So you think women in these countries are evil? It's just part of their culture. The women were never less than slaves. Many men died to protect and save them. Not many masters died for their slaves. Colleges most of history where for small 1-3% of populations - the aristocrats, not for everybody. Normal, average men could also not study. You are just obsessed with this patriarchy.

[_piotr]

Rather men were like slaves. They had to die for women in accidents, in wars. Women did not had to work and were treated as superior beings with chivalry reducing men to a butler that had to opened the door for women and serve them.

[nastyb]

@_piotr

quite funny how you think making up your own version of history counts as valid...

women have died giving birth to men for millions and millions of years. women never got to hold power in government or go to school because they were unpaid servants at home doing housework and raising children. without women, you wouldn't have dinner to eat, no clean clothes to wear, no children.

so show some respect.

[Women did not had to work and were treated as superior beings with chivalry reducing men to a butler that had to opened the door for women and serve them.]

if women were so respected, then why would they have to suffer "suffrage" their way to vote? men just opened doors for them to get sex. just like the same way men do today.

[nastyb]

@_piotr

do you realize women dying in childbirth was an extremely common thing for millions of years before modern technology?

[_piotr]

1) "quite funny how you think making up your own version of history counts as valid... "
Apparently you, think so, by creating your own victimised version of history". This just shows the failure of American education system.

2)"women never got to hold power in government" What a lie. Catherine the Great, Jadwiga of Poland, Wu Zetian and more. There were so many queens and empresses that had far greater power than than most todays government officials.

3) "unpaid servants" Another lie. Men had to work very hard to support for wife. Had to die to protect her. He could be drafted to war. While she was ripping all the benefits sitting safety at home. At least she could take care of children. In most nobility houses there were servants to do house chores - so wife could laze ale day thinking how to spend husbands money for her own pleasure.

4) "without women, you wouldn't have dinner to eat, no clean clothes to wear" Yet another lie!!! Men also can cook and clean. And they do not victimise themselves for doing that.

[_piotr]

5) "so show some respect." Funny considered all my life I witnessed women screaming and demanding respect, while never have I heard (even once) to "respect men". But men are trash for society, so no. Only women are to be prised as gods. Yeah... Maybe have some humility like men do.

6)"men just opened doors for them to get sex." Yet another lie! That butler thing and many more servitude laws (like men had to stand up, when women stood up.) required that men always do it to any women. So 99,9% of times men did it to women with whom sex was impossible for him. Learn about savoir-vivre of 19 century. You will clearly see that women are treated as superior beings.

7) Suffrage - Because for centuries women did not need to study or work hard, because they had their servants - men. It was quite shocking to society that they want to. Considering CENTURIES it took for average men to get right to study and vote, women got their pretty FAST.

There you go! I exposed are your lies. The only problem for women is giving birth to a child which she probably does 1, 2 or maybe 3 times tin whole life. While men work to advance medicine level to make it safer for her.

[lightbulb27]

some is ok as many women, due to their behavior and lack of strength in the system were abused [note all the women sexually abused in hollywood, pay scales, etc..]. but the extremes took it too far.

[bobcat57]

No, you bigot. Let people be equal. Anyone who demonizes all of feminism is a massive red flag. Y’all will say things like “I’m not sexist, but feminism has gone too far. No I support the real feminists but not these new woke ones.” And then go and support roe v wade being overturned. Like come on, what does it cost you to just hope that everyone can have a good life?


(I’m using “you” generally here, not referring to op or anyone else specifically)

[gothbxtch]

thank you fr

[MysticDevice]

The original iteration of feminism was a necessary movement when women were legitimately not treated equal by the law.

Today, however, its evolved into one of those movements where equality isn't enough and moman superiority must be achieved and so reverse sexism is being dabbled in. So today's feminism is extremely toxic and straight up sexist, while the original feminist movement was legitimately righteous and noble.

[DarkLegacy]

Feminism is evil so yes i agree, it has turned woman against man and man against women. It is dictatorial towards men and favourites women. It also is discriminatory against the disabled especially the learning disabled which here in the UK they are trying to criminalize

[MollyLolly21]

Disagree. Feminism has brought more equality to genders and allows the same rights as men. It’s empowered women and brought more independence and confidence. This isn’t to say that the more fringe/extreme cases of feminism represent feminism as a whole.

There is far greater things in society to worry about than fringe feminism. Of course, conservatives and religious alike will not like this as it puts their housewife idealism at risk and detracts from their patriarchal power.

[Lliam]

Well said.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

That would basically be just the act of equality by itself not feminism. If you like to believe that there exist a patriarchy that is detrimental to women then you're only looking at one side of the story then what you're doing is not the act of equality

[grega239]

Women still not legally obligated to go. To war.

Twitch, of, discord ig et. Are now online brothels.

Not to mention the birth rate is going down because women need to be boss babes and all that.

It has also caused millions of men to abandon relationships/ society

[Anonymous]

Yes, but I don't think feminism is inherently evil. I think most women that call themselves feminists are just seeking equality. But as with anything. It's a small segment that have to ruin it for the bunch. You have a small group of women who are flat out at war with men. And these women take great pride in trying to convince the other 90% of women they're unhappy and that men are against them. And some women are led easily enough to buy it.

[AviatorTom]

Initially, feminism was a positive influence on society, improving the standing of women in society. Over time, though, it has gone to extremes, and its overall effect now is less than positive.

[Mallic00]

No i just think most of the women who go on and on about it don't actually believe the words that come out of their mouths, they just want their cake and eat it too. They talk about equal rights and pay and wanting to be respected... but the MOMENT war breaks out they'll run right back into the kitchen and play the submissive, obedient housewife.

That's why i don't trust tradwives.

[provokeesmokee]

Good god you people forget how recently women won the right to vote.

It's wild how dumb young Americans are.

[DudeDiligence]

Recently? You do realize it's been more than a century, right?

[theroujdsquarebagel]

Ma’am recently?💀

[Siri137]

Feminists, vegans, radical environmentalists... I just wish they'd all disappear!

[BeMuse]

Feminism is just another "ism" created by the Satanic Communists to divide and conquer people. It a game, and women are the pawns.

[BeMuse]

Feminism is just like "Racism". Can you see how the myth of racism was used to divide modern society and get Blacks to follow BLM and burn down their own neighborhoods so that they have no jobs, no grocery stories to buy food in, no hope... All they can think about is how they are a victim of society and how the government needs to save them from their imaginary oppressors. Their new god is the government... Mean while they are their own oppressors and have devalued their own land and property and destroyed their own economy so that the communist globalists can purchase their land out from under them for pennies on the dollar or foreclose on them or get them through a tax deed when they can't pay because they were convinced to decimate their own economy.

[DextroShade]

Feminism has been an unmitigated disaster for humanity: it has destroyed the family unit, devalued the labor market, and ultimately leaves both men and women in loneliness and despair. It needs to be rolled back because it was a huge mistake.

[KetoJames]

It's kind of like BLM. They are evil, but hide behind a veil of goodness.

[DeeDeeDeVour]

"Toxic" is what I'll say about that.

[chicken_nugget24]

Look at the gender difference in the options lol. Some women can be toxic, but for the most part it's good for society ❤️

[Juxtapose]

Egalitarianism is fine, feminism is evil.

Feminism is the notion that you can solve the problems of the sexes by focusing on just one of them.

[RavVid]

Undoubtedly there have been benefits but also considerable detriments to women.

[exitseven]

Feminism runs counter to ten thousand years of evolution.

[Anonymous]

It is only a problem for weak, insecure and immature men.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

And I can also just say that feminism is for the weak, insecure and immature women. If you're so tough, why not man up instead of whining about your movement?

[DarkLegacy]

This is a weak, insecure and immature moderator behind this hence why my response to her keeps getting hidden.

[DarkLegacy]

I shall find it who it is, all i need to do is find the mod in her age range listed below anonymous who is currently active by looking for the feed and then block them and report them for breaching their powers. it is perfectly acceptable to say that someone is talking bullshit

[DarkLegacy]

And you are still talking bullshit by the way and going anon to do so.

[Fromdusktilldawn]

not really feminism but more extreme leftism and self entitlement

[Filthy_Immigrant]

Agree, and the way modern women behave nowadays I dont thik I need to explain it

[genericname85]

it absolutely had. i'm not just refering to 3rd or 4th wave feminism. i mean all of it.

[OddBeMe]

I just stupid memes as evidence for your side.

Increasing wages for females on my side. Was 77 cents per dollar. Now we’re into the 80s.

[LitanyofFears]

This current wave of feminism has brought nothing but evil. However, previous waves were actually constructive.

[Anonymous]

The early stuff was useful, but the modern version as practiced today is more harmful than helpful to the participants.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

I 100% agree and that's why I support equality not feminism.

[justabuddy]

I think feminism is something that had good roots, but as the tree grew the bugs and bacteria infected it.

[jshm2]

There are many types of feminism kiddo

[Asker]

I don't like any of them

[goaded]

Not even the one that got you the right to vote? How about the one that got you the right to have your own bank account without permission from your father or husband?

[DawnCoyote]

Depends on the person or how far are they are taking it

[Anonymous]

I agree. Men are meant to tell women exactly what to do

[Unit1]

Strongly disagree.

[invalid1]

It's being a lot
more of a madness actually.

[Staximus]

Some of it is good, some not so good

[msc545]

Absolutely agree.

[WhitneySnow]

Disagree

[whistlingwh0res]

It’s a demonic thing against playboys

[whistlingwh0res]

It’s just another shit

[Anonymous]

Yes I absolutely agree

[gothbxtch]

i disagree

[Exterminatore]

Agree.

[LimitedBenefits101]

Spot on

[TheCloud2]

Yes, very evil!

[Anonymous]

I agree

[Anonymous]

What a dumb take