Search Results: rules for calling back

So apparently, the High Court here in England's now ordered that part of the impending 2021 census guidance, accompanying the question on a person's sex (which will include a question about gender identity as well as the one about a person's legally registered sex for the first time, with the LGBTQ lobbyists citing it as a "step in the right direction")- which would have allowed people to use the sex and/or gender listed on their passports, and change it without a legal process- should be withdrawn.

This was thanks to campaign group 'Fair Play for Women'. which seeks to defend "the sex-based rights of women and girls", having launched a crowdfunded legal action against it, arguing that the census guidance on the question, "What is your sex?" was unlawful, and calling it "sex self-identification through the back door". After a court hearing on Tuesday, Mr Justice Swift ruled that the guidance should be changed to say individuals should only respond with the answer on their birth certificate or gender recognition certificate - a document which allows trans people to change their legal gender. He said he was satisfied the campaign group was "more likely than not to succeed" on its case, regarding the legal meaning of sex as defined in the legislation, with a full judicial review hearing set to take place next week before the census day.

Speaking before the hearing, Dr Nicola Williams, director of 'Fair Play For Women', said: "If we don't have good data on sex we can't monitor inequalities due to sex, and if we can't measure it, we can't make good policies to remedy it." The LGBTQ lobbyists, though, have been incensed by this legal action, decrying FPfW as "inherently sexist and transphobic", and declaring ideological war on the 'Right-wing Feminist Conservative Hate group'. So then, who do you think'll win the judicial review hearing- the feminists, or the LGBTQs? Who would you rather won? And what would the best case scenario end-result be, in your opinion?

With each passing day it becomes more and more obvious that men and women operate on 2 different sets of rules. Women can do things men wouldn't even consider and men are much more heavily scrutinized then women are which makes a lot of calls for equality come off as hypocritical.

I'm talking beating the shit out of a guy and then playing the victim when he hits back

I'm talking making 100k a year and expecting a dude who makes 1/5th of that to pay for a 500 dollar dinner.

I'm talking berating men for sexualizing women and then gushing on Twitter about how you wanna suck Park Ji-min's feet.

And all this came from one woman on here who said and I quote "Marry the accountant, and fuck the cowboy while he's at work" basically implying it's ok to cheat on your spouse if he isn't sufficiently manly.

To me it just sounds like those calling for equality just want the perks without being willing to play by the same rules. Which is why anytime someone calls out women who get payed the same as a man for less work, it's decryed as sexist.

Ladies I'm all for equality, but you can't just flip flop between being an equal and being a victim whenever its convenient for you.

Do you want to be treated like an equal and are willing to play by the same rules as men or do you wanna be treated like a woman who needs to be protected? Whichever it is at least be honest about what you want.