Search Results: rate guys

My question on "trolls vs normal users" (Trolls vs normal users: who creates a more loving environment? ) did not receive a great deal of attention.

Yet it revealed an important finding: 50% of us find that trolls actually contribute to the loving and caring environment which we all seek.

This current question has more to do with the question quality, rather than the outcome of the survey. I appreciate your rating and any feedback you may have regarding the qualitative aspects of the post.

Thank you for your time.

She would be a perfect match for him

He needs a neon jig to match her.

It's been said time and time again that it's not easy for most men to approach and flirt with a woman in public, and that even the most attractive confident men only have a 30 to 40% chance, at best, to impress a woman.

A 30 to 40% success rate still means rejection the majority of the time, and unlike in the pre-2000s, women nowadays tend to be a lot meaner and less empathetic about this than they used to (sorry, but it's true; a lot of y'all aren't nice).

Women also tend to not understand why only the most attractive, most ballsy 5% of men out there only hit on them, despite how many women will shout at, harass, curse out, or otherwise be viciously mean/rude to normal, decent men attempting to just get to know them better. (Not men being aggressive, rude, or not taking 'no' for an answer; just regular decent dudes.)

As a girl, are you the type to empathize with and understand just how hard it is for a guy (especially a not-handsome, not-fit, not-tall guy) to muster up the courage to ask a complete stranger to get to know him better and begin a potential relationship with him?

... Or are you the type of woman who will reject a guy loudly and rudely, because he was too short/ugly, wasted your time, or "couldn't see the tiny little wedding ring on your finger while you're holding your purse or phone" or something?

WHAT TYPE OF REJECTER ARE YOU WHEN IT COMES TO GUYS HITTING ON YOU?

Inspired by this question here.

So here are some statics on crime in America to help frame up the discussion.

www. graphics/investigations/police-shootings-database/

So according to FBI/DOJ statics in regards to police shootings, as you see Blacks are shot by police at a rate of 1 per every 40 million Black people. Whites are shot by police 1 for every 16 million. So this is concerning, but is it? 🤔

www.crime-in-the-u.s/2018/crime-in-the-u.s.-2018/tables/table-43

As you see in the numbers above, total number of Whites arrested in 2018 were 5.3 million. Total number of Blacks arrested was 2.1 Million. So 69% of all arrests were Whites, and 27% of all of all arrested were Blacks.

But as you look at the numbers for murder arrests. There were a total of 3,953 Whites arrested for murder, but there were 4,778 Blacks arrested for murder. That means 44.1% of all murder arrests were Whites, and 53.3% of all murder arrests where Blacks.

www. statistics/183489/population-of-the-us-by-ethnicity-since-2000/

So you see total population numbers for Whites and Blacks in the United States there were approximately 250 million White people, and 44 million Black people. So Blacks roughly make up 15% of the total population but account for 27% of all arrests and 44% of all murders, and are shoot by police at twice the rate of white people. But at 27% crime rate means blacks commit crime nearly 2 to 1 compared to Whites, and commit nearly 3 to 1 more murders. So Blacks are15% of the total population of United States and account for 27% of all crimes, and 53% of all murders.

So does means Black are commit crimes at twice the rate as Whites, murder at over 3 times the rate of whites?

So what are these social injustice types trying to tell us?

The answer really comes down to if you're willing to believe that the higher crime rates amoung blacks is due to systematic racial discrimination by Whites. Meaning its not their fault, its the white guys fault.