Search Results: no sex punishment

So till this day white southern Americans are condemned for the African slave trade
Till this day Catholics (of all races) are condemned for the inquisition.
Till this day white germans are condemned for the Jewish genocide and the holocaust.
But why isn't such horrible actions as condemned and recognized when it's done by muslims?
Let's take the Armenian genocide as an example. In 1915 ottoman soliders were commanded to kill Armenian unarmed civilians and leave no non Muslim or non turk alive. (Sounds familiar with Hitler?)
That being said, arabs captured many black Africans and sold them as slaves, and early Muslim armies of the khaliphates took the women of the cities they conquered as sex slaves. (Sounds familiar with the KKK?)
Till this day African illegal immigrants going to Europe are caught by the Libyans and sold as slaves for 700$ per slave.

Woah wait a minute what does this have to do with Islam? These people are not real muslims. Oh... sorry I didn't read the Quran very well, we've just got something from our friend "Muhammed":
(Quran 5:33)" Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment"
Prophet Muhammed also owned black slaves and had a sex slave called Sophia from khaybar.

Link for the Armenian genocide: https://youtu.be/BSchiqWIB6g
Link for Libyan slave trade:
https://youtu.be/dV7o31P4q4g

Because in the last week, Iceland's parliament unanimously passed new legislation placing the burden of proof for sexual consent on the accused; having sexual relations with any woman is now illegal without definitive proof of their explicit consent. Under the new law, consent must be clearly and voluntarily expressed– rather than the court focusing on whether the victim said ‘no’ or tried to fight back, the accused will now have to prove that the woman consented willingly.

The landmark bill states that:

Any person who has sexual intercourse or other sexual relations with a person without his or her consent shall be guilty of rape and shall be imprisoned for a minimum of one year and a maximum of 16 years.

Consent is considered present if it is expressed by free will. Consent is not considered present if violence, threats, or other unlawful coercion is used. ‘Violence’ here refers to the deprivation of independence by means of confinement, drugs, or other comparable means.

It is also considered rape and shall result in the same punishment as specified in the first paragraph of this Article to employ false pretences or utilize a persons‘s lack of understanding concerning circumstances, or exploit a person’s psychiatric disorder or other mental handicap in order to have sexual intercourse or other sexual relations with him or her, or the fact that, for other reasons, he or she is not in a condition to be able to resist the action or to understand its significance.

Sweden is also radically changing its laws around consent, with the introduction of two new offences, ‘negligent rape’ and ‘negligent sexual abuse’, with a maximum prison sentence of four years, set to be enforced in July; stating that, “It sends out the message that everyone is entitled to control their own sexual engagement and no one can be entitled to have sex with another person under any circumstances without her consent expressed by free will.”

What do you think of this?