Search Results: if men had to be pregnant

Sexual violence against men:

-Less than 3% of organizations that address rape as a weapon of war mention men as victims of this or provide services to male victims

-In regards to wartime sexual violence against men, castration in particular is used as a means of physical torture with strong psychological effects

Mass killings of men:

Non-combatant men and boys have been and continue to be the most frequent targets of mass killing and genocidal slaughter

There have been multiple acts of gendercide against men:

-The Anfal Campaign in Iraqi Kurdistan (1988)

-Armenian genocide (1915-17)

-Rwandan genodie (1994)

Rape resulting in impregnation (the man still having to pay child support)

-A man in louisiana had sex with a nurse in a hospital. She used the semen in his used condom to get pregnant without his consent. The court ruled that because there was consensual sex, even if the impregnation was non consensual as she used the sperm by getting out of the used condom, he still has to pay child support.

Women using sperm against man’s consent to get impregnated and succeed in getting child support.

-A man was raped after passing out drunk and intoxicated. The woman confessed to raping him (as you can get erect and ejaculate while unconscious). The court understood what she did but still decided that any wrongdoing on her part does not alter the fathers duty to provide support for the child. The man had to pay 9000 dollars up front and pay child support.

-A New York court ordered Deon Francois to pay child support to his ex-wife Chaamel after she forged his signature and allegedly had it notarized with a stolen seal and used his frozen sperm sample to conceive a daughter through a fertility clinic

The National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (NARAL) now refers to Mother's Day as "Birthing People's Day." As they explained in a May 6 Tweet:

"When we talk about birthing people, we're being inclusive. It's that simple. We use gender neutral language when talking about pregnancy, because it's not just cis-gender women that can get pregnant and give birth. Reproductive freedom is for *every* body."

Has any man ever given birth to a baby? (Some chick who declared herself to be a man but still has ovaries and a uterus does not count as a man.) Why do you need to be gender neutral when only women can give birth to a child?

Are the people on the far left so devoid of the ability to view themselves objectively that they actually think this makes sense?