Search Results: hang out definitions

I dont mean this in the most traditional definition of the words.
The way i see it, usually guys tend to be either more natural/comfortable with the ladies or with men. This has nothing to do with sexuality. Some guys just are more cool with guys like to hang out with them, talk to them, and usually ( but not always) like to do trafitional mens activites ( sports, car stuff, drinking together, hunting, etc) while some guys are actually more comfortable around and enjoy talking to women. They usually connect with women really fast and seem to enjoy or at least aren't hestitant to participate in activites that females enjoy ( but again, not always) . i think no one is a pure mans man or womens man in this way of definition, but everyone i know seems to tilt towards one of them much more than the other. I dont know much about thr female version for this but im sure the ladies can relate. so the same question to you too: are you a ladies lady or a mans lady?

Disclaimer: I'm not one of these moronic shitheads who are hung up on the definition of words who talk shit with no regards to how their words impact others, I just want your feedback.

A: I think the rhetoric is appropriate
B: I think we should use war rhetoric but we speak of cancer as if it's an invader when we should view the fight against cancer more like an insurgency
C: I see having cancer as a fight but I don't think war rhetoric is appropriate
D: I don't see having cancer as a fight.

I personally go with option B because I feel that we all to often portray cancer as something external that attacks us when we use war rhetoric. But infectious diseases seem more like an invading enemy and a conventional war. And like in a conventional war the combatants (bacteria and viruses) are well equipped and adapted killing machines but at the same time are easy for the bodys defenses to identify and attack. So like with battles in a conventional war they go by pretty quickly. With most lethal infectious diseases you either survive or die within a few weeks. But cancer isn't an enemy that comes in and choses to mess with you


It's part of your own cell mass that went rogue and spreads hidden throughout your body. Cancer cells aren't equipped with the same molecular mechanisms that pathogens are so individual cells don't have as much impact. But they're much harder to distinguish from the body's own cells. It's also a much longer struggle and because of the difficulty in identifying healthy cells from cancer cells, far more "collateral damage is inflicted in the process of eliminating the cancer cells. All of this makes it seem like an insurgency which tend to be "dirty wars". In another similarity, whenever the cells aggregate in a tumor you kill it with chemo or radiation but with each victory you feel yourself getting weaker, which brings to mind a certain rhyme: The point of Guerilla war is not to suceed; it's always been just to make the enemy BLEED