Search Results: who should i choose

Here are the die rules:

1 or 4, God wins
2 or 5, Satan wins
3 or 6, you win.

If God wins, you must go to theology school for 12 years and marry a hard core Pentecostal believer and worship God with all your heart, mind and soul and do away with all earthly pleasures of television, video games and secular music.

If Satan wins, you must blaspheme the Holy Ghost and attack anybody who mentions the name of Jesus. You must sacrifice your own blood into a cup with fellow theistic Satanists in a group of 6 devil worshippers monthly and take turns drinking it and pledge your allegiance to the wicked one for life to attain worldly powers and worldly knowledge.

If you win, you get a choice if you want your own universe without suffering and justifiable immorality in or if you want a universe where suffering is still possible or not. You can also choose to remain in this universe if you want. That way, you can't condemn God for forcing you to live in a universe without your consent. If you choose to remain in a universe of suffering, it's not immoral since it was your choice. You get to pick which parameters of the universe you want to live in and you get to choose whether you want sex, food, batteries, the existence of words or numbers and colors or not and if you want other creatures or just yourself. You can pick a universe where you indulge in sexual wickedness legal or not or if these terms exist or not. It could be a universe without birth or death. You get to pick illogical universe or not. You literally can pick absolutely any universe you want, which would you pick and why?

Would you let God rolls the die to decide your destiny? Allow Satan to choose your path or roll and decide yourself?

You are deciding who rolls the lucky die. Who do you want to blame should it not go your way?

Please share more details how the game can further be a winner's attitude toward why or why not gambling with die is for you or not.

Please pick the best answer.

Here's the definitions in this discussion:

Right = A human right or civil right is something every humans or every citizens have - and that's obligatory to give them.

Commodity = It can be bought and sold. You've to have money to buy it or earn it in a way and you don't have the right to get it for free.

Privilege = When you've an advantage, some goods etc. that others don't have because of you're for example lucky. Sometimes it's also a combination between luck and hard work.

My thoughts:
Pros: Disabled, old etc. who can't work and doesn't have a family taking care of them would be happy and it would be fairer since people doesn't choose to have a health problem making them unable to work.


There would be less differences between poor and rich.

Cons: There are people who works to make a product and resources can be expensive. So free food and water (and other welfare) means forcing someone to work for others. That wouldn't be motivating for businesses, so it would be less chance of them wanting to innovate etc.

People who are healthy, but doesn't want to work can just get things for free. That would be less motivating for the hardworking.

So it's difficult to decide if it should be a right or not.

These humans rights says nothing about food and water being human rights though:

#HumanRights

I've been talking to a gorgeous girl who's interested in me. The problem is that she lives far away. She's planning on moving to my city in 3 months but she's not sure if she will be able to yet.

Meanwhile another girl has shown interest in me. She's not anywhere near as attractive as the other girl but at least she lives close to me.

Is it worthy waiting for the gorgeous girl (not knowing if she will actually come) or should i stick to the girl that lives close to me?