Search Results: guys who are overweight

These two people have a sparring match in kickboxing/MMA. A non-violent fight between two combatants. This was a debate in my kickboxing gym tonight. I didn't participate though, cause I have no idea. If equally matched, the guy would likely win, but they're not equally matched.

A girl (Griselda).
25 years old
5'5" (165 cm)
154 lbs (70 kg)
Has been going to an MMA (mixed martial arts) gym two days a week, Tuesday and Thursday, for an entire year. Has been to roughly 100 classes.

A guy (Mendel).
40 years old
5'9" (175 cm)
220 lbs (100 kg)
Has been going to an MMA gym three days a week, Monday, Wednesday, Friday, for seven weeks. Has been to roughly 20 classes.

WHO DO YOU THINK HAS THE BEST CHANCE OF WINNING THIS FIGHT?

As someone who's short and ugly, I strongly believe women judge men' physical appearances very harshly. While men may be more "physical creatures" than women, they also tend to not be too picky on looks and have more variety on what they like (short or tall women, skinny or thick, flat or busty, light or dark, blonde or brunette, etc.) While most women around the world seem to want the same exact archetype of man: tall, athletic, handsome, and ego brimming out the ass. Short men get NO love, and even the 4% of women open to same-height or shorter men would still rather have a tall man (6' and over) than a short one, if all else were equal.

The only thing women seem more open minded about is weight; more women are open to overweight guys (as long as they're "slightly chubby"/"dad bods" and not legitimately fat).

What do you think? I'm guessing this question will have a huge gender bias gap.

Would you rather be a man who is short (under six feet tall), overweight, ugly, unattractive, small-dicked (less than 7"), and seen by 90-99% of women as completely undateable, but a hard-working intellectual genius (let's just say, an IQ of 170), and one of the top minds in your field, albeit not rich?

Or would you rather be a 6'5" tall, buff, super handsome, super-attractive guy with a big dick (8 or 9") who's 'sexy' enough can get pretty much 95% of straight women on the market, but really dumb (like AOC levels of stupid), vapid, and shallow and basically useless to society intellectually?

And no, you can't just change your appearance or anything. You are stuck this way for life.

If I dont want to date:
Overweight women
Deformed women
Single mothers
Divorced women
History of drug abuse
History of alcoholism
Ex-Party Girl
Slept with all her male friends
History of emotional problems
Ugly Face
Broke
Uneducated
Over 30
Over 40
No Ass
Lingering Ex's
In Debt
In General "Ain't shit" women... How exactly does that make a woman-hating, incel, beta, "not real man" who can't handle a real woman and all the rest of the bullshit I see on this page considering women have no issues when they see another woman have a shopping list of things a guy has to have before they even give him the time of day?

Explain to me why one is wrong and the other one is acceptable?