Fascbook has become a liberal media outlet, not a social media site. It blocks, removes and bans anything that goes against the liberal corporate media narrative. Fascbook HATES truth. When information is not allowed to be questioned or challenged, it is propaganda. Fascbook has a propaganda agenda.
They are doing it because the government wants to silence his voice because they want to remain in control of us. They know damn well if he were to become president again we would become great again. But there is a secret agenda and it won't allow trump. They need joe Bidens stupid babbling ass to be in control of to control us
You actually believe all that bullshit? For a second I thought you were joking- “government wants to silence trump” well no shit he’s a dumb jackass who’s racist and sexist. If you don’t believe that it’s not my fault. Plus, I’m wayyy younger than you yet I know better? That’s pretty embarrassing
Your age is showing. Joe Biden is the racist piece of shit who can't talk or walk in a straight line and sniffs little girls hair and who hasn't done shit but try to raise taxes. Donald Trump made peace with north Korea, has raised the employment numbers the highest they have ever been, have actually helped the black community and LGBT community.
@Zzmaex You just think you know better because you are not old enough to know you don't. I can list tons of Biden quotes that are in fact racist. How many Trump quotes can you list?
@Zzmaex your the jack ass... when he was president he had the economy running right or better than ever before... had the border situation under control... of course the covid virus ended all that how can you compete when your economy has been shutdown.
Mark Zuckerberg is a billionaire, and the people who help him run it are millionaires, so why would such an organisation support socialism in any way, shape or form?
@goaded They think reasonable gun control and a universal health scheme is Stalinism, fascism and radical Islam all rolled into one, when in fact it's just sensible, decent policy that no rational person could seriously reject.
@Bellatris you don't just because some computer geeks are rich doesn't mean they don't socialism or worse support it... your acting like you know which makes me laugh at you.
Okay, laugh, I don't care, but in my view anyone who gets rich from exploiting workers in far away lands like China whilst pocketing the profits (ex. the Amazon CEO, Bezos), is NOT a socialist! Socialism is for the worker, not against him/her, and aims for a society that isn't fragmented, hierarchical and unjust. It's a system that rewards those who actually do the work, as opposed to those who just sit in comfortable chairs in air-conditioned offices while their stock value goes up as they "invest" in yet another expensive yacht or sports-car.
@Bellatris why does facebook block news stories favorable to republicans? why do they constantly block pro republican new items... even though your rich you don't give a damn about the working people
If you really believe that Facebook does that, then why are you even using it? I don't, I've never had a Facebook account, because the entire concept is ridiculous. Posting images and other very personal information for the entire world to see is just narcissistic in the extreme, not to mention reckless.
@Bellatris it's all rubbish what i have on facebook it is a news source from non-news people... like the dread that the covid vaacines are... you have a lot to learn about politics i was once on the inside of politics so i have an idea of their strategy... australians are probably more honest overall so you might not get how dirty our politics are and how filthy our people are.
@Bellatris Because it isn't their money they plan to give up, it's yours and mine. Just like Al Gore pushing carbon offset credits while flying around the world in a jet or Leonardo Dicaprio pushing his environmentalist agenda while flying across the world to accept an environmental award they have no plans to alter their own lifestyle. In fact they justify their own indulgences by claiming that they are necessary to spread the word and make sure the rest of us filthy polluters are in check.
Some don't understand how the elite view socialism and what that means. It means they know best what to do with your money and their own. They keep theirs and redistribute yours
Zuchaburger is a tool who thinks he is a gift to the world and he is better than everyone because he has a platform that is used by so many. His opinion is just that, an opinion. Plus he can't be that intelligent because if I remember correctly, he didn't even graduate from college despite trying and failing.
The life time ban is kind of moot. Even if he were to be unbanned it wouldn't take long for him to violate the terms of service. The banhammer would fall much more swiftly as he's no no longer president. The punishment would also be more severe on a second ban
I don't think they did reject the idea of a permanent ban. AIUI, it was more along the lines of "if someone else had done this, their account would have been deleted; why didn't you delete this one?".
They basically said you should have followed pre existing guidlines. Thing is even if they delete the account. If isn't going to take him long to just have his cult re follow his new account. Deleting the account just means he can make a new one. Ban omg him means he can't make a new one or use an alt account. Deletion of the account isn't a punishment in the least, just a headache for the intern that's tasked with making the new account.
Amidst his confusion, he sometimes speaks truths that are so powerful, they're damning to the CIA / Soros neo-Nazi NWO cult. He gives a voice to those this cabal has worked tirelessly for almost a century to deny a voice to.
Their being drunk on power is threatened if loudmouths like Donny are ever again allowed a voice. So, human rights and fairness be damned, the Tidery will continue.
Since he left office, pedophilia has gone back to being out of control. Sounds like he was telling the truth on that one. He only lied about being able to stamp it out in 4 years.
i found it super problematic, when they censored the fucking president. that is not ok and should come with extreme punishments for facebook. however blocking trump as a private person is totally fine. i see no issue with that.
it's like: it's legal to insult a policeman if they're not on duty but if they are on duty, that is illegal. they should treat the seat of the president like that.
Please give an example of how Trump is racist. A couple of years before running for president, he was given an award by the New York NAACP for being the most pro=minority business leader in the city.
@JamesRandiDebates Is he racist? I dunno, making sure no blacks are ever allowed to rent in his buildings. Might that count? It's called red-lining. He and daddy did this for years in NYC. Making sure that no Latina's or blacks ever got membership in any of his golf clubs. Does that count? Calling survivors of deadly regimes from Central America, rapists, thieves, and drug dealers. Might that count?
Your points 1 and 2 have been proven false time and again. Your 3rd point, well if you want to defend criminals, and get all butt hurt when someone calls them what they are, go right ahead
@JamesRandiDebates He has tried to get armed insurrectionists to overturn the confirmation of the current president. That is a traitorous act of sedition.
It is a well-known fact that he and his father redlined their properties against non-whites. It is documented, look it up.
He proved he was unfit for office when he spent OUR money, to the tune of multi-millions, on his golf trips. He spent more time campaigning and golfing than fixing our problems, while he caused more problems by giving himself, his spawn, and his buddies a massive 3 trillion dollar tax break.
Just his own words when discussing misogynistic, "grab 'em by the pussy".
He raped a 13 year old girl. That, sir, is pedophilia.
@JamesRandiDebates Perhaps but I know a conman when I see one and I knew him when we both lived in NYC. He was a bigot back then, racist to the core, conman just like his daddy. You watch too much right-wingnut media. I don't think you're old enough to actually have followed his antics.
Facebook is not free speach. It's a private party. A very big private party, but a private party. If someone gets too drunk and start stirring shit up, they're gonna get kicked out of the party.
Since Trump nearly caused our government to be overthrown, the fewer people he can reach the better. To clarify I am not saying he incited the insurrection on January 6. I am saying he was inciting it from the moment he launched in 2016 campaign.
They're a privately-run firm. They can ban anyone they like. That's how it works, and no, this isn't - is NOT - a free speech issue. I don't hate Donald Trump. I don't like him either, but while he was the president he had a really big mouth and an obnoxious attitude. He would deliberately try to start fights, especially on Twitter (who also ended up blocking him). He was often his own worst enemy, so it's no surprise he lost the election, even to a senile, old, incompetent coot like Biden.
No they are not. They claim to be a platform so they are not responsible for any content and thus cannot be sued over it however this would also require that they not currate content which is precisely what they are doing. So they must choose one or the other, currently they are claiming to be a platform i. e. a common carrier to avoid negative consequences for themselves while acting like a publisher by silencing voices they don't like.
I like Trump, but agree that they have the right to do as they please when it comes to banning people. I think it's chicken shit of them, but it is their choice.
No, that is incorrect. When you censor people, that is not "curating content", that is censorship. Pretending like them censoring one half of the nation, the then sitting president, etc. because of bandwith is just moronically stupid, no one is going to buy that argument because even the social media giants haven't even attempted to make such an idiotically stupid and obviously false argument. Its censorship when you silence one idea but not another, its censorship when you say this political party can say and do what ever they want but another cannot speak at all. This is reality.
Trump will start a new platform and after 2022 midterms, when the House and Senate are retaken by the GOP, socal media will be declared regulated utilities and be subject to armloads of law suits for censorship. They will be broken up.
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(36-45)
+1 y
Not terribly surprising. At this point they do NOT want the dude or any of his allies to come back into elected office. That would mean immediate regulatory scrutiny and possible anti-trust action.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
84Opinion
Good hope they make the shit permanent
I thought he was making his own platform. I can’t wait to join 😈
I want to see the body of anonymous join and rip it to pieces lol
I know lol
Fascbook has become a liberal media outlet, not a social media site. It blocks, removes and bans anything that goes against the liberal corporate media narrative. Fascbook HATES truth.
When information is not allowed to be questioned or challenged, it is propaganda. Fascbook has a propaganda agenda.
A lot of people seem to agree with fb.
I wonder how many of them will reveal themselves as total hypocrites when it happens to them.
Just because his opinions may be dumb, censoring people because of that is what fascists do.
So all of you applauding this , congrats , you have something in n common with nazis
They are doing it because the government wants to silence his voice because they want to remain in control of us. They know damn well if he were to become president again we would become great again. But there is a secret agenda and it won't allow trump. They need joe Bidens stupid babbling ass to be in control of to control us
You actually believe all that bullshit? For a second I thought you were joking- “government wants to silence trump” well no shit he’s a dumb jackass who’s racist and sexist. If you don’t believe that it’s not my fault. Plus, I’m wayyy younger than you yet I know better? That’s pretty embarrassing
Your age is showing. Joe Biden is the racist piece of shit who can't talk or walk in a straight line and sniffs little girls hair and who hasn't done shit but try to raise taxes. Donald Trump made peace with north Korea, has raised the employment numbers the highest they have ever been, have actually helped the black community and LGBT community.
honestly the fact you think you’re right about this is just humiliating. Not replying to this anymore
@Zzmaex You just think you know better because you are not old enough to know you don't. I can list tons of Biden quotes that are in fact racist. How many Trump quotes can you list?
@Zzmaex your the jack ass... when he was president he had the economy running right or better than ever before... had the border situation under control... of course the covid virus ended all that how can you compete when your economy has been shutdown.
Big tech are the dictators and tyrants of our age. If they can silence the president what will they do to the rest of us dissidents.
The thing is, he isn't the President, and he can easily make his own website.
let's face it facebook is a socialist organization... they block news stifle and/or hide... facebook sucks
How much is the owner worth, right now? Over $100 billion? Totally socialist.
Mark Zuckerberg is a billionaire, and the people who help him run it are millionaires, so why would such an organisation support socialism in any way, shape or form?
@Bellatris Exactly. Some people have no idea what socialism actually involves.
@Bellatris because they do you must be stupid
Is it just me, or have the Republicans moved so far right that democracy is considered socialism?
@goaded apparently so
@goaded They think reasonable gun control and a universal health scheme is Stalinism, fascism and radical Islam all rolled into one, when in fact it's just sensible, decent policy that no rational person could seriously reject.
I'm not stupid, but you certainly have no idea, no clue as to what socialism actually is. Please consult a dictionary.
@Bellatris you don't just because some computer geeks are rich doesn't mean they don't socialism or worse support it... your acting like you know which makes me laugh at you.
Okay, laugh, I don't care, but in my view anyone who gets rich from exploiting workers in far away lands like China whilst pocketing the profits (ex. the Amazon CEO, Bezos), is NOT a socialist! Socialism is for the worker, not against him/her, and aims for a society that isn't fragmented, hierarchical and unjust. It's a system that rewards those who actually do the work, as opposed to those who just sit in comfortable chairs in air-conditioned offices while their stock value goes up as they "invest" in yet another expensive yacht or sports-car.
@Bellatris why does facebook block news stories favorable to republicans? why do they constantly block pro republican new items... even though your rich you don't give a damn about the working people
If you really believe that Facebook does that, then why are you even using it? I don't, I've never had a Facebook account, because the entire concept is ridiculous. Posting images and other very personal information for the entire world to see is just narcissistic in the extreme, not to mention reckless.
@Bellatris it's all rubbish what i have on facebook it is a news source from non-news people... like the dread that the covid vaacines are... you have a lot to learn about politics i was once on the inside of politics so i have an idea of their strategy... australians are probably more honest overall so you might not get how dirty our politics are and how filthy our people are.
So true and exactly why I don't have an account.
@Bellatris Because it isn't their money they plan to give up, it's yours and mine. Just like Al Gore pushing carbon offset credits while flying around the world in a jet or Leonardo Dicaprio pushing his environmentalist agenda while flying across the world to accept an environmental award they have no plans to alter their own lifestyle. In fact they justify their own indulgences by claiming that they are necessary to spread the word and make sure the rest of us filthy polluters are in check.
Some don't understand how the elite view socialism and what that means. It means they know best what to do with your money and their own. They keep theirs and redistribute yours
@DocJones In socialism, there is no "they" - there is only an "us". Yet another person with a defective education.
Zuchaburger is a tool who thinks he is a gift to the world and he is better than everyone because he has a platform that is used by so many. His opinion is just that, an opinion. Plus he can't be that intelligent because if I remember correctly, he didn't even graduate from college despite trying and failing.
Not an unmixed victory for Facebook. The board rejected the idea of a permanent ban.
The life time ban is kind of moot. Even if he were to be unbanned it wouldn't take long for him to violate the terms of service. The banhammer would fall much more swiftly as he's no no longer president. The punishment would also be more severe on a second ban
@LZPanzer you are probably correct
I don't think they did reject the idea of a permanent ban. AIUI, it was more along the lines of "if someone else had done this, their account would have been deleted; why didn't you delete this one?".
They basically said you should have followed pre existing guidlines. Thing is even if they delete the account. If isn't going to take him long to just have his cult re follow his new account. Deleting the account just means he can make a new one. Ban omg him means he can't make a new one or use an alt account. Deletion of the account isn't a punishment in the least, just a headache for the intern that's tasked with making the new account.
Amidst his confusion, he sometimes speaks truths that are so powerful, they're damning to the CIA / Soros neo-Nazi NWO cult. He gives a voice to those this cabal has worked tirelessly for almost a century to deny a voice to.
Their being drunk on power is threatened if loudmouths like Donny are ever again allowed a voice. So, human rights and fairness be damned, the Tidery will continue.
He speaks lies.
Since he left office, pedophilia has gone back to being out of control. Sounds like he was telling the truth on that one. He only lied about being able to stamp it out in 4 years.
i found it super problematic, when they censored the fucking president. that is not ok and should come with extreme punishments for facebook. however blocking trump as a private person is totally fine. i see no issue with that.
it's like: it's legal to insult a policeman if they're not on duty but if they are on duty, that is illegal. they should treat the seat of the president like that.
I think it’s smart. We don’t need more idiots on the internet
When are you leaving then?
@888theGreat whenever you leave
You leave first
@888theGreat do trump supporters just love arguing with people or do you all really support a racist and sexist asshole?
That was Biden , you are asking the wrong people
@888theGreat Nice debate skills. Resorting to no im not you are. Classic strategy. There is no way to come back from such a perfect position.😬
One too many judging by your comment.
It should be a lifetime ban. T raitor
R acist
U nfit for any office
M misogynistic asshole
P edophile
@888theGreat Right and my liberal/socialist ass will continue to work to keep his NAZI loving ass out of the White House again. Thanks for playing.
Please give an example of how Trump is racist. A couple of years before running for president, he was given an award by the New York NAACP for being the most pro=minority business leader in the city.
@JamesRandiDebates Is he racist? I dunno, making sure no blacks are ever allowed to rent in his buildings. Might that count? It's called red-lining. He and daddy did this for years in NYC. Making sure that no Latina's or blacks ever got membership in any of his golf clubs. Does that count? Calling survivors of deadly regimes from Central America, rapists, thieves, and drug dealers. Might that count?
Your points 1 and 2 have been proven false time and again. Your 3rd point, well if you want to defend criminals, and get all butt hurt when someone calls them what they are, go right ahead
@JamesRandiDebates He has tried to get armed insurrectionists to overturn the confirmation of the current president. That is a traitorous act of sedition.
It is a well-known fact that he and his father redlined their properties against non-whites. It is documented, look it up.
He proved he was unfit for office when he spent OUR money, to the tune of multi-millions, on his golf trips. He spent more time campaigning and golfing than fixing our problems, while he caused more problems by giving himself, his spawn, and his buddies a massive 3 trillion dollar tax break.
Just his own words when discussing misogynistic, "grab 'em by the pussy".
He raped a 13 year old girl. That, sir, is pedophilia.
Wow. You have terminal TDS.
@JamesRandiDebates Perhaps but I know a conman when I see one and I knew him when we both lived in NYC. He was a bigot back then, racist to the core, conman just like his daddy. You watch too much right-wingnut media. I don't think you're old enough to actually have followed his antics.
Well facebook is a privilege and as a private business they have a right to not service someone who broke their rules.
Facebook is not free speach. It's a private party. A very big private party, but a private party. If someone gets too drunk and start stirring shit up, they're gonna get kicked out of the party.
That's actually hilarious. Facebook has standards. Lol
Since Trump nearly caused our government to be overthrown, the fewer people he can reach the better. To clarify I am not saying he incited the insurrection on January 6. I am saying he was inciting it from the moment he launched in 2016 campaign.
They're a privately-run firm. They can ban anyone they like. That's how it works, and no, this isn't - is NOT - a free speech issue.
I don't hate Donald Trump. I don't like him either, but while he was the president he had a really big mouth and an obnoxious attitude. He would deliberately try to start fights, especially on Twitter (who also ended up blocking him). He was often his own worst enemy, so it's no surprise he lost the election, even to a senile, old, incompetent coot like Biden.
No they are not. They claim to be a platform so they are not responsible for any content and thus cannot be sued over it however this would also require that they not currate content which is precisely what they are doing. So they must choose one or the other, currently they are claiming to be a platform i. e. a common carrier to avoid negative consequences for themselves while acting like a publisher by silencing voices they don't like.
I like Trump, but agree that they have the right to do as they please when it comes to banning people. I think it's chicken shit of them, but it is their choice.
@hellionthesagereborn They have to curate content. Nobody has unlimited bandwidth or storage or resources.
No, that is incorrect. When you censor people, that is not "curating content", that is censorship. Pretending like them censoring one half of the nation, the then sitting president, etc. because of bandwith is just moronically stupid, no one is going to buy that argument because even the social media giants haven't even attempted to make such an idiotically stupid and obviously false argument. Its censorship when you silence one idea but not another, its censorship when you say this political party can say and do what ever they want but another cannot speak at all. This is reality.
Trump will start a new platform and after 2022 midterms, when the House and Senate are retaken by the GOP, socal media will be declared regulated utilities and be subject to armloads of law suits for censorship. They will be broken up.
Not terribly surprising. At this point they do NOT want the dude or any of his allies to come back into elected office. That would mean immediate regulatory scrutiny and possible anti-trust action.
Dangerous political bias. Corporations should be politically neutral and not censor things they disagree with for political reasons