I am from Sweden and I choose Iceland. I think just about the only country that went after the banks last time they ruined the economy. I feel that their willingness to pursue the incredibly rich and wealthy is in low supply elsewhere in the world and could be very useful to sort out everything.
I'll accept no King whosoever.
I am from Israel
And il say that Canada shuld be the first, yet to meet a candain I did not like
They seem to be doing pretty good and keeping pretty qruit over all, that I belive shows there doing not bad over all
There also qruit big meaning they got that part down on the size
Switzerland because it seems to be a tolerant and peaceful country.
Finland for first and Iceland for second.
They both have the typical Scandinavian approach and both do it better than the other scandi countries (my own included) while having less to work with.
My first vote does go to Finland. A country that, while only having average assets, frequently rates first in healthcare, education, happiness and more. Sanna Marin is also, for a politican, a pretty kickass person. If of course not perfect.
It’s 💩. The Russian economy is 💩. There’s just no need for foreign dollars there now. Putin will continue to decline in health as his replacement is being groomed.
There are plenty it could not be.
Hard working out sensible ones or Rather not to messed up.
New Zealand, Finland, Luxembourg
That's not how it works, you homeschooled gimp. Kings rule kingdoms, and leave the throne on death. They don't get voted on.
That wouldn’t be a monarchy. I’ve never known a monarchy to last for only 12 months by design. What you’re talking about is presidency. USA is already on top. But the gap is closing.
@Red-Blaze A despot. Yeah, probably. I was being nitpicky.
Fascists, dictatorships, monarchs, communists. They all had some brief success in their history. But when they break down it is usually for the same reason, too few people who BELIEVE they have the aptitude to make too many decisions for too many people. Democracy seems to be the best check and balance for this appointing more representatives as the country expands. I’d argue it’s time for the senate to revisit whether two people is enough for each state at the federal level. Countries founders set up these rules when we were no where near 300 million people.
And by gap closing, I mean standards of living wise. At least that’s what my macroeconomic professor claimed. Weird dude with a weird shaped head. But I’m not sure
www.oecd.org/.../...he-Worlds-Listed-Companies.pdf
So I could see why other countries would want absolute control with the USA on top. Good luck getting that to happen. What if you had a country made up entirely of women? Men? Gays? By race? Vegans? Vegetarians? Scientists? Religious fanatics? Atheists? Agnostics? Those who sit on the toilet to pee verse those who stand?<-I sit for low toilets because the splash back at my height is annoying to clean. Although it is extra work I have to do with frequent sitting as opposed to periodic cleaning. Urinals are ingenius for men, impractical for women. That’s the next big mainstream invention, standing urination for women on the go<-punny.
Kekistan for sure. We deserve to rule this world... and would do a better job than the rest.
You are all traitors! Live free or die! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
I'd vote for The Netherlands. Any country that can figure out how to survive by reclaiming the sea, and then keeping it out, knows what they're doing, and would be a great ruler.
Russian ruble is the number one currency and they control all the oil and gas. Germany got cut off from Russia gas and they're in deep shit now. Russia will take over if putin isn't stopped.
If it couldn’t be the USA then Canada or Australia
🦃 they are central of the world
Tanzania 🇹🇿🇹🇿🇹🇿🇹🇿
Mexico just to trigger the Americans on GAG
Australia
Bhutan
🇳🇴🇳🇴🇳🇴
New Zealand
France
Most Helpful Guys