So if lauren boebert wins Colorado, does that mean there was cheating, or does that only happen when republicans lose?

[Anonymous]

[Goforit1010]

False! Just because a Republican wins an election doesn't mean cheating wasn't involved in the election.

Democrats LOVE mail-in voting which Is a flat out invite to voter fraud through ballot harvesting and illegal votes from voters who should be purged from voter rolls. People who have moved, changed their name (married women), died, moved out of state, or those that are illegally registered to phony addresses all need to be purged and corrected for those who changed their name.

ANYONE whose ballot is submitted under false pretenses (listed above) commits voter fraud!

Democrats LOVE to shotgun mail ballots to everyone on the voter roll, REGARDLESS if those individuals asked for a ballot or not. That leads to thousands of ballots being thrown out (and subsequently collected by leftists) who fill them out and mail them in for their D candidate.

How is this fraud perpetuated? Because in a election where the vote count is close, those fraud ballots are re-counted as valid ballots as long as they meet the requirements (post dated by the date of election, signed, dated, etc...).

In Lauren Bobert's situation, I believe they will need a re-count due to the close tallies of the vote count. She's claiming she won due to the number she's leading by and the remaining number of votes left.

[goaded]

https://twitter.com/i/status/1593302913493118976

"Here is what I would say to Joe Biden: Any election I don't like is stolen. Any election where you get 81 million tabulations, not votes, is stolen. It's pretty simple. If I don't like it, it's stolen. If I like it, it's not stolen. If you win, it's stolen." Ali Alexander (the leader of the Stop The Steal group).

It's really simple, it's really obvious, and a third of the country just doesn't get it.

[Agagagagaga]

https://youtu.be/XX2Ejqjz6TA

[goaded]

@Agagagagaga That's a nice video, I wonder how long it took the GOP to compile it.

Of course, you could probably fill 12 minutes with 700 different videos of Trump saying the word "stolen" taken from his speeches over the last two years.

Would you like the facts to go along with the video? What am I saying? Of course you won't.

[Agagagagaga]

We both know that one side is allowed to dispute an election and claim it was illegitimate...

... while the other side ends up investigated.

And uh, go eat some sauerkraut you Nazi fuck. 👍

[goaded]

@Agagagagaga We both know that one side has evidence on their side, and the other doesn't. Would you like the facts behind everything said in the video now? If you like, you can pick just one, your strongest argument that Democrats are just as bad as Republicans (which is a pretty weak argument in itself).

[Agagagagaga]

I don’t need to make an argument. Why argue with anyone who is so comfortable with double-standards and hypocrisy? Besides, I don’t argue with foreigners, let alone Douche-landers.

[goaded]

@Agagagagaga It couldn't possibly be because you don't have any facts on your side.

[Revvl]

@Agagagagaga
Awesome post!

[Anonymous]

A leftist making an irrelevant and unsubstantiated argument to prove a point that doesn't actually exist. A senile, elderly man who couldn't run an Office Depot wins the most powerful office in the world by more votes than any other president in history, including 18 million more votes than Obama, who was the most popular president in over 50 years?

[Agagagagaga]

It’s beyond ridiculous that people think that election wasn’t shady as hell.

[goaded]

He was running against the least popular president in over 100.

[Revvl]

It was fraud and I doubt there will ever be any fair elections in the future.

[Revvl]

@goaded
The whiny German troll strikes again.

[goaded]

@Revvl You sound like a sock puppet for someone who's been here a while. Sad.

[Revvl]

@goaded

Sorry, but I have to block you for being a troll.

[goaded]

@Revvl Whatever, troll.

[Midgetmcwidget]

No idea, I'm outside of USA. I don't understand why so place take days or weeks to count while others are done overnight. It's strange to me.

[Roxxy99]

Different states have different election laws. Some count mail in ballots before Election Day. Others wait until after to process them.

[goaded]

Some let people "fix" the envelopes for their mail-in ballots if they've made a mistake (like forgetting to sign, or put the wrong date), that takes time, too, but it ensures their valid vote gets counted.

[DarkWinterNights]

I always find it interesting that they can never get polling right. But they always get the battleground elections correct. And in most of these races, the Republican is ahead on election night and for a week afterwards. Until the very end and the Democrat clinches it and they call the race immediately after. If we don’t start fixing these security issues in our elections it’s going to destroy this country. This should concern you regardless of which side of the aisle you’re on or there will be nothing left to vote for.

[exitseven]

I don't know. Was there unsolicited mail in ballots? How about ballot harvesting and unsecured drop boxes? Did they require an ID card to vote? How about early votong? Any problem with voting machines or were there any floods or fires at polling places?

[Revvl]

I live in an apartment and only got 4 mail-in ballots this time. If someone wanted to dumpster dive, they could probably get hundreds of ballots.

[goaded]

@Revvl And you call me a troll!

[exitseven]

@Revvl My son got seven. He voted in person on election day.

[goaded]

Bull.

[FunkyMonkee]

I got at least two ballots. They're sitting in my shredding pile. I voted in person!
A few days ago, a woman in Calif. found a bag of mail with mail-in ballots in it, it was tossed over the hillside!! The bag was retrieved and a couple of the people whose votes were ion the bag were pissed that they're votes didn't get counted!

[goaded]

@FunkyMonkee I'm sure that made the news. Link?

[FunkyMonkee]

@goaded Sure did! That's how I saw it!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g901Karkz7k

[goaded]

@FunkyMonkee "Compared to other nearby counties, Santa Clara County has more democratic voters." bestneighborhood.org/.../

So they'd be mostly Democratic votes being thrown away. Good to know.

[FunkyMonkee]

@goaded As long as they're not republican votes.

[goaded]

@FunkyMonkee Wow. Most people wouldn't say that out loud. Once the ballot is out of the envelope, it's invalid; there's no way to know beforehand who they were voting for, but throw out a dozen ballots in that county, you've probably improved Republican's odds.

[FunkyMonkee]

@goaded Good!! The repubs in office, the better!!

[goaded]

@FunkyMonkee So you're encouraging voter fraud.

[FunkyMonkee]

@goaded If it's good enough for your crowd!! Besides, we're not sick, evil elitists hell bent on destroying the country, like you are..

[goaded]

@FunkyMonkee No, that would be the people trying to stop American democracy by not accepting the results of elections they don't like.

"Popular means that people support it, which they do. It sucks, and it is what it is, but that’s why we need a dictatorship. That’s unironically why we need to get rid of all that. We need to take control of the media or take control of the government and force the people to believe what we believe or force them to play by our rules and reshape the society.” Nick Fuentes

[FunkyMonkee]

@goaded Yeah! That's the people I'm talking about! The democrats.
Yes, the people support Trump! So, just get over it and live with it like we're forced to do with Dictator Joey!
We HAVE a dictatorship!! can't you see how it's ripping the country to dust? Anybody that can't is blind or flat out stupider than a pancake!!
The democrats already HAVE control of the media!! That's why you're all so brainwashed!

[goaded]

@FunkyMonkee According to you the Democrats also had control of all the Republican run states that Trump lost. You're crazy.

[FunkyMonkee]

@goaded The ONLY reason Trump lost them was because the dems CHEATED!!!

[goaded]

@FunkyMonkee No, it was because he was a twice impeached historically unpopular president that people realised wasn't up to the job even before he tried to unlawfully hold on to the presidency by lies, fraud, and violence.

[FunkyMonkee]

@goaded MAYBE, SOME DAY, you'll wake the fuck up and see things as they are and NOT as CNN tells you to perceive and believe them.

[goaded]

@FunkyMonkee Of course InfoWars is a much more reputable source, and Jan 6th that was shown live around the world was all crisis actors or feds who are in prison now as political prisoners...

[FunkyMonkee]

In the meantime, Hitlary lost fair and square and she pitched a MAJOR bitch about it for YEARS and is STILL crying about it!! And that fat Cabbage Patch Doll in Georgia refuses to believe she lost her last election!
The only difference is, we have proof of the fraud! They don't!

[Anonymous]

Do you perhaps have proof he cheated? If not there probably was not cheating. But you might be right, maybe cheating is the only way for the dems to win 🤔 Could be possible. Or are you saying there was so little cheating in 2020 that we should never trust anyone who claimed Trump supporters cheated because you think that cheating was so impossible in the election Biden "won"?

[joeldalton]

Did 48% of the voting machines “malfunction” in Colorado? Did vote counting result in a statistically impossible spike in the middle of the night for Boebert?

[goaded]

"Did 48% of the voting machines “malfunction”" anywhere?

[joeldalton]

@goaded centers, not machines. I misremembered.

[goaded]

You mean the toner cartridges in the printers that ran out of ink, but all votes were counted anyway? In Arizona?

[joeldalton]

@goaded I mean voting machines and printers that previously worked up until the votes needed to be counted. yeah, those.

[goaded]

But in a completely different state. The printouts were dim but legible, and they were all counted.

[joeldalton]

@goaded some of them even 2-3 times.

[goaded]

No, that would be what sane people call: a lie. So so far you've asserted that nearly half the voting machines malfunctioned in Colorado, when it was actually in Arizona, and then doubled-down by saying the votes that were counted despite the problems were counted twice by bipartisan groups. Double or nothing: were you wrong about anything?

[joeldalton]

@goaded I never said it was in colorado you dip shit. I asked if the same things happened in colorado as happened in Arizona.

[goaded]

So, that would be $4 you owe me. "Did 48% of the voting machines “malfunction” in Colorado?" you said.

[joeldalton]

@goaded yes, it was a question, because I knew they had in Arizona. IF so, then maybe there was cheating in Colorado also. Your dumb ass can't even read. you owe me $10 for reading your idiocy

[goaded]

So were you trying to say the election in Colorado was better or worse than the one in Arizona? What about your "statistically impossible spike"? Do you know what you were talking about there?

[joeldalton]

@goaded of course I do. You won't understand it so I'm not going to bother explaining it.

[goaded]

Ah, the standard response of someone who can't explain themselves.

[joeldalton]

@goaded you've already demonstrated an inability to read.

[goaded]

So clarify for me. You said: "Did 48% of the voting machines “malfunction” in Colorado? Did vote counting result in a statistically impossible spike in the middle of the night for Boebert?"

Referencing a different state's problems that didn't affect a single ballot and something you won't explain ("a statistically impossible spike in the middle of the night").

Tell me, what do either of these things have to do with Colorado or Boebert?

[joeldalton]

@goaded The op asked if there was cheating in Colorado, I answered, you didn’t understand my answer so started in with your usual bullshit.

[goaded]

Loser.

[Still-alive]

nah no cheating just a lot of morons who somehow think she makes a good politician. i would be so embarrassed if i lived there in that district and she wins.

[Anonymous]

https://www.youtube.com/embed/XX2Ejqjz6TA

Ahem.

[goaded]

You know, an audit of Florida in 2001 (like the one in Arizona that found an even bigger margin for Biden in 2020) found that "Gore would have won by 60 to 171 votes" (and therefore the presidency, and that's ignoring the overvotes (two votes for president on one ballot) which were 68,476 for Gore (plus a minor candidate) and 23,591 for Bush (ditto), and the 173,000 registered voters in Florida who were permanently wiped off the voter rolls before the election (just like Kemp did in Georgia before 2018), not to mention a certain Roger Stone who organised a "riot".

en.wikipedia.org/.../2000_United_States_presidential_election_recount_in_Florida

[888theGreat]

She led most of the way

[goaded]

You mean until most of the votes were counted.