Can Jake Tapper be an unbiased moderator?

[Dargil]

Here a few of his "accomplishments".

Suggested Trump was a nightmare: “For tens of millions of our fellow Americans, their long national nightmare is over.”
Claimed Trump “continues to lie to the American people” about coronavirus testing.
Retweeted a post that called Trump “100% insane.”
Shamed Trump upon being hospitalized for the coronavirus.
Described Trump’s presidency as a “disaster.”
Ran a segment about the alleged shape of Trump’s penis.
Questioned the 2016 election by perpetrating the Russia collusion hoax.
Suggested Trump tried to kill democracy.
Ordered CNN’s control room not to cover Trump live.
Claimed Trump was a “rather angry defendant, saying there’s no case here.”
Refused to cover Trump live due to “potentially dangerous” content.
Suggested Trump was leading the nation “down the drain.”
Accused Trump of siding with Russia during Russia collusion hoax.
Said Trump “sided with the enemy” amid Democrat claims of a stolen 2016 election.

[normalice]

No one can be unbiased. The question is does someone have the wisdom and integrity to strive for impartiality. And I don't think Tapper or anyone still working for CNN does. False equivalence at CNN is too much part of the culture. There is almost no chance he will not try to frame some minor mistake of Biden as equal to some absolute disaster of Trump. They do it for a living.

[exitseven]

He is a liberal hack. The debate will basically be a hit job. The moderators will steer the debate and limit it to 3 topics, Abortion, Jan 6th And Trumps conviction anything else and they will cut Trumps mic. They will make sure that Biden gets a bathroom break if it seems like the drugs are wearing off

V