So are we still pretending Judge Cannon isn't just a Trump loyalist?

[Anonymous]

Seems like her final ham fisted move was to simply dismiss the case. I suppose it was always going to happen but it's weird it happened this soon. My guess is Trump told her he can't cover the legal fees any more and it has been delayed enough, so the timing is fine. I don't know what the prosecution's next move is but hopefully there is one. Surely we aren't just going to let him sell us out without consequences, right?

[WhiteSteve]

So crazy. Like they’re just PREVENTING things from being even looked into.

No matter what happens with any case now due to the Supreme Court’s sabotage, always remember that Trump’s defenses in these cases were never really “I didn’t do it”, and instead, they argue for technicalities and to just avoid having the cases even HEARD. Very obvious who is and isn’t telling the truth in these situations, whether they manage to hold him legally responsible or not.

[Avicenna]

Leftists hate when they don't have a kangaroo court under their full control in far-left jurisdictions and start to stamp their feet and throw hissy fits. Funny how you had no complaints about Judge Merchan, an obvious Biden loyalist who didn't do the job a judge is supposed to do- ensure defendants' rights are protected.

[Asker]

You mean right wingers love it when their decades of packing the court with activist judges pays off and whine when it doesn't.

[Avicenna]

"Packing courts"? Where have we heard that before? Oh. wait... FDR and more recently a number of far-left Democrats wanting to do that. You far-left types can't handle anything that dissents from your totalitarian agenda and points out its unconstitutional nature. And "activist" would be a great description of Judge Merchan and other leftists who legislate from the bench.

[Asker]

No, you just said the democrats want to do that so people are confused when you do it.

[Anonymous]

We all knew what would happen there the second a judge he appointed got his case. It will be appealed successfully and moved to a different judge. This is just a delay.

[DryGermanGuy]

A scandalous decision in a long line of scandalous decisions. And look! Clarence Thomas has his grubby fingers on it, too! This is so rotten.

https://youtu.be/UjaQdJl3jMs?si=EUhzbC4_UfuQCN9Y

[hahahmm]

When Judges appointed by Obama & Biden rule against Trump you don't have a problem with it so I don'r really care about a hypocrite's complaints.

[Asker]

Because they go out of their way to appear impartial. And since pretty much everything that "appears" is written down and becomes the rule, appearing impartial is the same as being impartial.

Judge Cannon has made no attempt to appear impartial.

[hahahmm]

"appearing impartial is the same as being impartial." --- Yeah, right. So if the law says that I can put you in prison for 20 years because you went 10 miles over the speed limit and I put you in prison like that it's okay. Even if the other 50 million people who went over the speed limit only got a ticket or no punishment at all. You sound like a good little NAZI storm trooper who would round up anybody your leader tells you to without question.

[Asker]

Feel free to explain how you would appear impartial while doing that. 🍿

[hahahmm]

Look up kangaroo court.

[Asker]

No. Explain how you would single one person out for a hefty sentence while giving everyone else just a ticket but still look impartial. It is your claim so you can do it. I'm not going to look things up to try to decrypt whatever nonsense you are talking about. You can explain it or admit you are wrong.

[hahahmm]

It's exactly what happened to Trump with the real estate case. It's what happened to him with the rape case where there is zero evidence, zero witnesses and zero proof he was even where they alleged victim says the crime happened. Same alleged victim went on tv decades ago talking about how rape is a fantasy. Trump stated that she isn't even his type so why would he even go for her & he was hit with fines for not finding her attractive.
With the documents case... Biden was given a pass because he is "too old" ... lmao. Right.
So you need to think more about what has happened or you'll keep sounding foolish.

[Asker]

So, no answer.

There was evidence and pretending there wasn't only shows that you just want him to get away with it.

For biden, the Trump appointed prosecutor wrote that there was no evidence of a crime. He only also wrote the nonsense about him being to old so right wing media had a way to spin it.

[hahahmm]

Hilarious how you ignore what the prosecutor said that you disagree with. You're a clown. Stop pretending to be some kind of moral authority. You're not. I'm done with you now. Jog on.

[Asker]

"Hilarious how you ignore what the prosecutor said that you disagree with" after I just called you on that exact thing 🤔

[Avicenna]

Activist Democrat judges "appearing impartial"? Now that is pure hilarity. Quite to the contrary, as Judge Merchan and his Democratic Party consultant daughter showed us.

She's been impartial, you just hate the fact that she rules on constitutional principles instead of far-left ideology.

[Asker]

You people call them that only because you want to trump to get away with it.

[NamerOfStars]

Well, given that you've already decided his guilt WITHOUT trial or evidence, are you still going to pretend you have a measure of objectivity in the matter?

[Asker]

I'm not on the jury but the fact is no one is arguing he isn't guilty - they are arguing he should be immune to prosecution.

[adventurous-1]

I think Jack has always had a plan "B" knowing this day may come. We'll just have to wait to see what he does.

[exitseven]

He appointed her. That does not mean that her ruling is not based on legal principles. It is obvious that a lot of the so called evidence was planted by the FBI. The charges should be dropped.

[Asker]

When the appeals court, also with trump appointees, has reversed her insane decisions in the past, it's clear her loyalty is to trump not principle.

But anyway I'm well aware you'd prefer he get away with it and don't care if he is guilty. So you are necissarily arguing in bad faith here.

[Avicenna]

Please be specific as to these reversals- when and by what judges? Interestingly, you're admitting that judges Trump appointed are impartial, something we don't see from judges appointed by Democrats.

[Asker]

I'm not going to respond to every comment. You can just refer to the prior one.

[Anonymous]

Do you think the Manhattan judge was a Biden loyalist? He voted for him, donated to him, had a daughter that made money off of him... At least Cannon has a legitimate reason to dismiss the case.

[Asker]

Worshiping Trump is not a legitimate reason to dismiss the case.

And the Manhattan judge allowed the case to go to trial by a jury agreed to by trumps lawyers, so there was no possibility of injecting whatever bias the far right is telling itself is rampant.

[Opinion Owner]

The judge controlled the court room, moron! He let Stormy Daniels be a witness, she had absolutely no knowledge of the charges, she was there only to bash Trump. He wouldn't allow the former director of FEC testify, on Trump's behalf, because he came to the conclusion Trump didn't commit a crime. He also told the jury they didn't have to unanimous on a specific crime he covered up! The jury is only as informed as a judge allows them to be. Now, tell me why Cannon dismissed the case? You don't even know, do you? Lol lol ha ha

[Asker]

Cannon dismissed the case because she worships Trump. But her stated reason is because Jack Smith was illegally appointed. This is simply false but is popular rhetoric in far right misinfotainment circles.

As for your far right caricature of the Manhattan jugdge, it's clear you want to believe that nonsense no matter what is true so I don't think talking to you about it is going to resolve anything for you.

[Opinion Owner]

What's not to believe? Those are facts about what happened inside the court room. I have to honestly say, I haven't heard anything about Smith's being illegally appointed until today but according to her, and many, many others interruption of the constitution, there is no question he was. It's a legitimate reason for dismissing, you just can't accept, because for once you don't get your way, so you have to cry.

[Asker]

No, that's far right misinformation intended to push the rhetoric that Trump is a victim. This is because the far right know no one is going to vote for project 2025 based on merit or policy so they have to get people worked up with grievance, anger, and victimhood.

[Opinion Owner]

I don't know where you get your information but I'm really sorry you're being lied to, it's making you look really foolish.

[WhiteSteve]

All we’re asking is for the cases to just be HEARD. Dismissing it because the Supreme Court changed the rules mid-game doesn’t give the public answers, and the public deserves answers. If he beats the case straight up, good enough, I’d accept that, and the facts of this very important matter won’t have been shielded from view. Very suspect when you just clearly don’t want the evidence to see the light of day and just makes you look more guilty.

[Asker]

Suffice it to say I don't get my information from people who cry that they are just entertainment when they get sued for libel 🤷

[Opinion Owner]

@WhiteSteve The judges ruling had nothing to do with SCOUTS's ruling.

[Opinion Owner]

Normalice! I recognize your psychotic rantings anywhere lol

[Asker]

You mean my plain descriptions of reality.

And I'm happy to announce that I am normalice. I tried doing that in the question details but the far right mods on this site freeze my account for making a member post whenever I do that. I only post anonymously to help people who blocked me gain access to critical information y'all have created a bubble to avoid.

[Opinion Owner]

I wouldn't block you and I totally get what you're saying about the mods! I have to go Anon at times also.

[Avicenna]

Judge Merchan violated Trump's rights, and you think that's appropriate? You're a complete Stalinist.

What is your legal basis for claiming that Jack Smith was in fact legally appointed? You claim a lot but never back it up.

[Asker]

No he didn't.

The problem with arguing with people like you is I've seen no indication that you actually want him to be held accountable if he is indeed guilty. Instead, you seem to be desperate that he get away with any crime - even shooting someone in the middle of fifth Avenue. So, you're not asking any of this because you want to know. You're just trying to "flood the zone with shit," because that's all you have to say 🤷

[noohair]

And your point is? The Justice Department is in the bag for Biden.

[Asker]

It is true the far right fake news like to brainwash people with that misinformation but that's just because they want trump to be allowed to commit crimes.

[noohair]

And you are not brainwashed? I guess you can't handle the truth.

[Asker]

No, I'm not brainwashed with the misinformation that the justice department is in the bag for Biden and don't know anyone who is.

[Anonymous]

You can pretend she is a Trump royalist if you need to, does not mean its true.

[Asker]

Her actions are that of someone who is loyal to trump, not of an impartial judge.

[Dargil]

She is a constitutional originalist.

[Asker]

She is a Trump loyalist.

[Dargil]

Same thing.

[Asker]

Loyalty to christian nationalism is specifically excluded from the constitution.

[Dargil]

Where does it say that?

[Asker]

The first ammendment.

[Avicenna]

No, it doesn't dumbass. And "Christian nationalism" is a made-up pejorative term by crazed leftists.

Asker, you're projecting your own obeisance to far-left extremism onto other people in other contexts.

[Asker]

Nope, christian nationalism is when you want unimpeachable power and want to force others to pretend to believe a bunch of grievance myths to justify it. That's exactly you 🤷

[Guacamole409]

I can hardly wait until I can be anon like you.

[gorydetails]

Good for her for upholding the law.

[Asker]

She didn't uphold the law but rather upheld far right misinformation.

[gorydetails]

lmao. no she didn't.

[Asker]

But you're addicted to far right misinformation so why would you be honest about such things 🤷

[gorydetails]

And you're addicted to being a moron.

[Asker]

I'm sorry you feel that way but it's none of my business.

[gorydetails]

yup.

[gorydetails]

Weird flex calling the constitution "right wing misinformation".

[Asker]

She didn't uphold the constitution, either.

[gorydetails]

lol, jack smith was appointed illegally, case closed.

[Asker]

I'm sorry you feel that way but alas he wasn't.

[gorydetails]

100% was. Sorry you're so upset Trump can't get railroaded with more bs charges.

[Asker]

This frees up the prosecution to pursue a different judge. The only question at this point is if Trump wins, because then he will simply fire the prosecutor and/or pardon himself. And that's what you actually want, isn't it. You don't care if he is guilty. You just want christian nationalism..

[gorydetails]

ooooh you said the words!!! You get your lefty gold star of the day!

[Asker]

Lol, thanks!