Why should I, as a Democrat, vote for Harris when she didn't earn my vote and openly accepted the endorsement of right wing neocons?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Then don't. Though you most likely are just pretending to be a Democrat to parrot Republican talking points because a 7 year old can figure out you don't have to vote for someone if you don't want to and you're allegedly an adult.

[lightbulb27]

you shouldn't. only if you like whomever has been writing her scripts and the thinktank making her policies... whomever that is.

[DryGermanGuy]

It's either that or considered to be a DINO.

[Asker]

Yea, I'm not the DINO, Harris is for accepting the endorsements of Right Wing Neocons. She could have rejected their endorsement, but instead embraced them with open arms.

[DryGermanGuy]

I consider it quite a feat to unglue some oldschool Republicans to the point of them going publicly against the nominated party candidate. It's also a unique situation. Under the danger of Trumpism 2.0, the Democrats should welcome all hands on deck.

[Asker]

Yeah I'm not welcoming right wing neocons, especially ones responsible for the distarous Iraq war. Only reason these wing neocons endorsed Harris is because Trump is neocon lite and Harris is a full neolib. Neither candidate will get my vote, a neocon/ neolib is a neocon/neolib no matter how lite they are.

[Twalli]

If someone supports me and is willing to vote me into a public office, it'd be really stupid for me to say no to them. They're agreeing with her plans, not the other way around. They're agreeing with what she wants, not the other way around. If you agree with her views, then you support her. It's just that simple. You don't have to agree with all those who support her, just her.

[Asker]

@Twalli "They're agreeing with her plans, not the other way around" they are agreeing to her plan, because it's the same as theirs.

[DryGermanGuy]

I wouldn't overthink it. It's an alliance for a limited time, driven by a common enemy.

[Syntosi]

The alternative is Trump, which if you have not noticed is not much of an option. In a two party system like in USA you do not vote for a candidate, you vote against one. Sucks I know, but its a limitation of the primitive and broken voting system.

[Asker]

Trump is not a alternative, alternative is to vote for Jill Stein who doesn't support genocide.

[Syntosi]

No, Jill Stein is not an alternative since USA has an unofficial 2 party system. Voters for any other party or person is completely wasted. Also Jill Stein is not a serious candidate either so I would not vote for them regardless.

[exitseven]

You should not vote for her. If the democrats get away with blowing off the election process they should not be rewarded with a win. Cast your vote for Trump and send them a message.

[CuriousMufuxka]

Hey it's your choice. I'm not going to sway you towards a 60 year old that refuses to answer softball questions or a 78 year old that shows up almost daily via McDonald's, podcasts, rallies, etc.

[dreamstar72]

I alway wonder why do people think they have to vote for the one in the party they are registered in.

[In_Trance]

Ridiculous

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

You don't have too. You can give your vote to whom you choose or not choose to vote at all.

[DrPepper12]

Did Trump openly accept the KKK endorsement with any reservations? If anything, don't vote at all but I hope you'll reconsider Kamala

[Asker]

I don't need to reconsider voting for Harris, Harris and the Democrats have done nothing to earn my vote, they have done the complete opposite. I'm no longer backing a party who campaigns on protecting democracy while actively sues to keep candidates off ballots and refuse to support a candidate who got 0 primary votes and welcomed Right wing neocons with open arms. The party that has become pro war can get their votes else ware.

[Twalli]

The alternative is worse. Although if you live in a state that isn't really a battleground one, just don't vote.

[Ladsin2]

You shouldn't