What do you think about this comment?

[Anonymous]

Everything has a creator and the universe is gods creation and proof god exists.

[slatyb]

Circular argument that assumes the conclusion. "Everything has a creator" requires evidence. You have none.

[DrPepper12]

Laughably false. Like hysterically insane, illogical & naive.

[CalmUntilAbused]

Well... If everything has its creator, then You are correct. However, the intuition that everything has its creator cannot be proven to be correct. It seems logical to many humans, but there is no solid proof. It was Immanuel Kant who proved that it is neither possible to prove that God exists not that He does not exist. Not that it matters much... Only that second part makes fools of all the "scientific" atheists who claim that science proves that God does not exist.

However, the very reason faith is called "faith" is that there will never be a solid proof in our lifetime... Unless we live long enough to witness the Apocalypse. There is no reason to fret over it. If You are a believer, just keep strong in the faith. I mean... The very concept of a Being whose existence cannot be either proved or disproved is quite overwhelming... Just because nothing can be said about this Being's existence does not mean the Being does not exist, and it's also proof that if such a Being exists, it can easily elude our human logic, while also hinting heavily on the existence of such a Being. However, all You need is a reason to believe. Not a proof, a reason to believe. I do have one. You do have one. All is fine.

[Syntosi]

That is a flawed argument. First of all, nothing says that everything has a creator. It is entirely possible according to our understanding of the world that something could be "created" without a creator.

Secondly, if we for the sake of argument still accepts that everything has a creator and the universe was created by God.. then who created God? And who created the thing that created God? etc.. It is an argument that is circular because you can't have a beginning if everything requires a separate creator.

If you argue that God does not need a creator to create them then.. why could that not be true for the universe?

[strateguy632]

You self contradicted as tony pointed out here!

You can't claim "everything" has a creator because that included god.

Does my apple tree "have a creator" or grow from seeds? your claim doesn't even start.

Also the "universe" between stars is empty. Does it need any making?

[strateguy632]

Why do so many atheists agnostics reject logic as part of your faith that god "can't be proven"? ↗

[lightbulb27]

interesting thought, does not make sense to me.

whom created God then... so that don't work

Proof, I'd say no. Evidence, maybe.

I'd say God IS and is timeless, the universe beholds the creation.

Adn we are lucky to be conscious enough to dwell upon it all...

So live fully you pink anonymous persons:)

[andreasderjuengere]

I believe in what you say - that's right.

But a ''proof'' cannot be delivered in such a way that those who doubt (or question/challenge) will be convinced.

And... is there a ''proof'' required? I owe no explanation to anyone about what I think... or believe :)

[Anonymous]

the Law of Conservation of Matter contradicts the Big Bang theory

god is omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient beyond mortal human understanding

most people can't even comprehend Tensor Calculus or the mind of a robot or the size of the Earth let alone the size of the observable universe let alone comprehend God who is beyond all of that

[CalmUntilAbused]

Only problem is, on quantum level, the Law of Conservation of Matter no longer works... The only thing that is indeed conserved is energy... With matter as one of its forms. Not to say that the apparent probabilistic chaos in the quantum universe alongside the existence of predictable laws in the universe as we know it is not a big hint that God does, indeed, exist. It's still a hint and not a proof, though. If someone wants to doubt and calculate how all those potentially infinite quantum probabilities add up (or rather multiply up) to a predictable macroscale universe, let them do it. Any probability lesser than 1 will degrade to values indicating low probability quite quickly through multiplication, thus indicating that our universe as we see it is literally unlikely to exist, which some might take as "should not exist"... And some will stick to "but it does exist", reducing themselves to believers of their own eyes (which is, philosophically speaking, pretty foolish).

[Opinion Owner]

@CalmUntilAbused it's not just the Law of Conservation of Matter vs the Big Bang but also the fact the speed of light supposedly can not be exceeded yet the observable universe is somehow ~93 billion light years across despite the universe supposedly being ~13 billion years old which would indicate an expansion faster than the fastest known speed in the universe

even on a quantum level it shouldn't make a difference because it's only a difference in size so the math shouldn't really change. numbers could get infinitely smaller without ever reaching zero

[Dargil]

Right-on sister.

[Anonymous]

Sometimes simply the time and energy mingle together and give rise to a creation so not everything has a created but sometimes it creates it's own with the help of its own energy and time.

[strateguy632]

"Energy"? Who made energy?

[Opinion Owner]

It isn't necessary to create everything by single creater. Sometimes things can happen it's own, or by multiple factors coming out together. There is no need for creater all the time.

[kaucky1]

Reality check beings made of words and names came into existence that's why overpopulated even God has a birthday a conspiracy 420,420,000 B. G. E. had to time travel with blanket and telescope

[strateguy632]

"Reality" this? 😜

[Anonymous]

Prove everything has a creator

[TonyMetal___86]

But god do not have a creator